Motivations of MPharm students in the United Kingdom to study pharmacy at a time of change

Authors

  • Halima Shaikh School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston
  • Abdelbary M A Elhissi School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston
  • Samir Vohra School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston
  • Bethany Joan Pearson School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston
  • Kevin M G Taylor Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, London

Keywords:

Education, Fees, MPharm, Pharmacy, Student, University, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: In the United Kingdom (UK), pharmacy student numbers are increasing as the number of pharmacy schools increases. This is likely to have a negative impact on employment opportunities at a time when new entrants to UK pharmacy schools are paying dramatically increased tuition fees. Moreover, proposed changes to the Master of Pharmacy (MPham) programme, with pre-registration training integrated into undergraduate education has profound implications for the future student experience.

Aims: To identify the main factors which influenced the decision of current students at one UK school of pharmacy to study pharmacy, and those factors which would have impacted on that decision if faced with pay tuition fees of £9,000 ($14,700). Also, the study aimed to gather students’ opinions on the impact of increased fees on the number of pharmacy applicants, and whether their preference is for a four-year MPharm course or a five-year integrated programme.

Method: Questionnaires were distributed to pharmacy students of all four years at the School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Preston, UK; in the academic year 2011/2012.

Results: A response rate of 88.6% (n=133) to the questionnaires was achieved. The main factor influencing pharmacy students’ decision to study pharmacy was their interest in pharmacy, though they believed if they had to pay increased tuition fees, then the financial rewards of a pharmacy career would be most important. Fifty- seven percent (n=76) of the students felt the number of students applying for pharmacy would decrease as a result of the rise in the tuition fees, whilst 71% (n=95) preferred the current four + one MPharm course structure rather than the proposed five- year integrated course.

Conclusion: Reasons for studying pharmacy were multi-factorial. However, with increased tuition fees, financial considerations were considered a greater motivator, potentially conflicting with the traditional core values of pharmacy, namely service- orientation and altruism. The proposed integrated five-year MPharm is not yet defined, but appeals less than the present structure to current students. Changes to the degree programmes and higher tuition fees may potentially impact negatively on future applications to study pharmacy. 

References

Bassey, R. (2012). Student trends may have implications for the future of the profession. Pharmaceutical Journal, 289, 151 -152.

British Pharmaceutical Students’ Association. (2012). The imbalance between pre-registration training and undergraduate pharmacy student numbers (online). Available at: www.bpsa.co.uk. Accessed August 2012.

Ferguson, J.A., Roller, L. & Wertheimer, A.I. (1986). Social factors motivating students towards a career in pharmacy, Journal of Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 3, 127-135.

Harding, G., & Taylor, K.M.G. (2001). Pharmacy as a profession. In Pharmacy Practice (eds. K.M.G. Taylor & G. Harding), Taylor and Francis: London, pp. 187-202.

Hassell, K. (2000). The impact of social change on professions - gender and pharmacy in the UK: an agenda for action. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 8, 1-9.

Hassell, K. (2006). Workforce update- joiners, leavers, and practicing and non-practicing pharmacists on the 2005 register. Pharmaceutical Journal, 276, 40-42.

National Health Service. (2012). National NHS Pharmacy Staffing Establishment and Vacancy Survey (online). Available at: www.nhspedc. nhs.uk/surveys.htm. Accessed August 2012.

Pharmaceutical Journal. (2011). Job market dip affecting locum rates. Pharmaceutical Journal, 286, 154.

Pharmaceutical Journal. (2012a). A step in the right direction. Pharmaceutical Journal, 289, 146

Pharmaceutical Journal. (2012b). Cuts to locum pay attacked in PJ online poll.

Pharmaceutical Journal, 288, 266.

Smith, A. & Darracott, R. (2011). Modernising

Pharmacy Careers Programme. Medical Education England.

Taylor, K.M.G., Bates, I.P. & Harding, G. (2004). The implications of increasing student numbers for pharmacy education. Pharmacy Education, 4, 33-39.

Willis, S., Hassell, K. & Noyce, P. (2008). Career intentions for pharmacy students. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13, 45-51.

Willis, S.C., Shann., P. & Hassell, K. (2006). Studying pharmacy: who, when, how, why, what next? Report 4 analysis of questionnaires. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.

Willis, S.C., Shann.P. & Hassell, K. (2009). Pharmacy career deciding: making choice a “good fit”. Journal of Health Organization & Management, 23, 85-102.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2013

How to Cite

Shaikh, H., Elhissi, A. M. A., Vohra, S., Pearson, B. J., & Taylor, K. M. G. (2013). Motivations of MPharm students in the United Kingdom to study pharmacy at a time of change. Pharmacy Education, 13. Retrieved from https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/211

Issue

Section

Research Article