Student Pharmacists’ Perceptions of the Difficulty of Topics and Preferences for Learning Tools for Incorporation in a Mobile Application for Reinforcement of the Pharmaceutical Biochemistry Course Content

Authors

  • Melany P Puglisi Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628
  • Michael Nolan Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628
  • Tatjana Petrova Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628
  • Tauseef Salim Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628
  • Anna Ratka Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628

Keywords:

Pharmacy Education, Student Perceptions, M-Learning, Biochemistry

Abstract

There is interest in implementing new technology in the pharmacy professional curriculum. The objectives of this study were to: (1) assess the perceived level of difficulty of topics in Pharmaceutical Biochemistry in the Pharm.D programme; and (2) assess the student perceptions of what learning methods can be used to reinforce the course material. A 32 item questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale (least to most difficult) was administered to 240 professional students. Section A asked respondents to rate the level of difficulty of the topics taught in the course. Section B asked respondents to choose learning methods for reinforcing lectures. Protein structure and non-covalent bonding were rated easier while carbohydrates, glycolysis, cell signaling, RNA, DNA and biotechnology were rated as more difficult. Students chose practice quizzes for all topics. The results demonstrate that respondents perceive practice quizzes, animation, flash cards and 3D models as useful tools. 

Author Biographies

Melany P Puglisi, Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628

Associate Professor - Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy

 

Michael Nolan, Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628

Pharmacist - College of Pharmacy

 

Tatjana Petrova, Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628

Associate Professor - Department of Pharmacy Practice

 

Tauseef Salim, Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628

Pharmacist - College of Pharmacy

 

Anna Ratka, Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois 60628

Chair and Professor - Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences 

 

References

Al-Fahad, F.N. (2009). Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8, 111–119.

Albarrak A.I. (2011). E-learning in medical education and blended learning approach. In Education in a Technological World. (ed. A. Mendez-Vilas). Badajoz, Spain: Formatex., pp.147-153.

Alzaza, N.S. & Yaakub, A.R. (2011). Students’ awareness and requirements of mobile learning services in the higher education environment. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3, 95–100.

Capretz, L.F. & Alrasheedi, M. (2013). A meta-analysis of critical success factors affecting mobile learning. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Paper 18.

Chen, B. & Denoyelles, A. (2013). Exploring students’ mobile learning practices in higher education. Educause Review Online. Available at: http://www.educause.edu/ ero/. Accessed 15th May, 2016.

Chuttur, M.Y. (2009). Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37).

Craig, P.A., Michel, LV. & Bateman, R.C. (2013). A survey of educational uses of molecular visualization freeware. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 41, 193-205.

Crawford, S.Y., Alhreish, S.K. & Popovich, N.G. (2012). Comparison of learning styles of pharmacy students and faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76, 192.

De Fátima Wardenski, R., De Espíndola, M.B., Struchiner, M. & Giannella, T.R. (2012). Blended learning in biochemistry education: analysis of medical students' perceptions. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40, 222-228.

Fox, L.M., Pham, K.H. & Dollar, M. (2007). Using interactive digital images of products to teach pharmaceutics. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(3), 58.

Gable, R.K. & Wolf, M.B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Gibbins, S., Sosabowski, M.H. & Cunningham, J. (2003). Evaluation of a web-based resource to support a molecular biology practical class - does computer-aided learning really work? Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31, 352-355

Gonzalez-Banales, D.L. & Monarrez-Armendariz, C. (2014). Incorporation of social networking and application of responsive design for Moodle. Innovation and Research in Engineering Magazine, 11, 50-61.

Karaksha, A., Grant, G., Anoopkumar-Dukie, S., Nirthanan, S.N. & Davey A.K. (2013). Student engagement in pharmacology courses using online learning tools. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, 125.

Lee, H.S., Kim, T.G. & Choi, J.Y. (2012). A study on the factors affect smart phone application acceptance. In 3rd International conference on e-Education, e-Business, e- Management and e-Learning. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research,

, 27-34. Singapore: IACSIT Press.

Loertscher, J., Green, D., Lewis, J.E., Lin, S. & Minderhout, V. (2014) Identification of threshold concepts for biochemistry. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 516 – 528.

Martín, S., Díaz, G., Cristóbal, E.S., Gil, R., Castro, M. & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers and Education, 57, 1893-1906.

Pereira, J.A., Pleguezuelos, E., Merí, A., Molina-ros, A., Molina-tomás, M.C. & Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Medical Education, 41, 189-95.

Petrova, T., Kavookjian, J., Madison, M.B., Dagley, J., Shannon, D. & McDonough, S. (2014). Motivational Interviewing Skills in Health Care Encounters (MISHCE): Development and psychometric testing of assessment tool. Research and Social Administrative Pharmacy. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.12.001

Prescott, J., Ellen, S., Wilson, E. & Wan, K. (2014). Pharmacy students’ perceptions of natural science and mathematics subjects. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78, 118.

Pursell, D.P. (2009). Adapting to student learning styles: Engaging students with cell technology in organic chemistry instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(10), 1219-1222.

Reid, L.D., Motycka, C., Mobley, C. & Meldrum, M. (2006). Comparing self-reported burnout of pharmacy students on the founding campus with those at distance campuses. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(5), 114.

Ruth, D. M., Mastre, T. M. & Fricker, R. (2013). A study of mobile learning trends at the U.S. Naval Academy and the Naval Postgraduate School. Educause Review Online. Available at: http://www.educause. edu/. Accessed 15th May, 2016.

Teri, S., Acai, A., Griffith, D., Mahmoud, Q., Ma, D.W. & Newton, G. (2014). Student use and pedagogical impact of a mobile learning application. Biochemistry and Moleculary Biology Education, 42, 121-35.

Varghese, J., Faith, M. & Jacob, M. (2012). Impact of e- resources on learning in biochemistry: first-year medical students' perceptions. BioMed Central Medical Education, 12, 21.

White, B., Kahriman A., Luberice L. & Idleh F. (2010). Evaluation of software for introducing protein structure. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 38, 284-289.

Williams, C. (2002). Learning On-line: A review of recent literature in a rapidly expanding field. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26, 263-272.

Yilmaz, O. & Sanalan, V.A. (2011). M-Learning: M- learning applications, students input for M-Learning in science instruction. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 172-180.

Downloads

Published

09-06-2017

How to Cite

Puglisi, M. P., Nolan, M., Petrova, T., Salim, T., & Ratka, A. (2017). Student Pharmacists’ Perceptions of the Difficulty of Topics and Preferences for Learning Tools for Incorporation in a Mobile Application for Reinforcement of the Pharmaceutical Biochemistry Course Content. Pharmacy Education, 17. Retrieved from https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/451

Issue

Section

Research Article