article/article.tpl

An evaluation of the impact of immediate compared to delayed feedback on the development of counselling skills in pharmacy students

Alexander J DeLucenay, Kelly M Conn, Anthony Corigliano

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based counselling using standardised patients (SPs) provide pharmacy students an authentic approach to training; limited data exists regarding student performance using immediate feedback approaches.

Aims: To compare grades of students receiving immediate feedback verses (vs.) delayed feedback.

Methods: A pre-trial assessment of student perceptions and an unblinded randomised trial comparing immediate and delayed feedback. Third year pharmacy students (n=153) counselled SPs in four clinical “experiences”; student grades were the primary outcome. Student t-test and repeated measures were used to compare grades between groups and grades over time.

Results: During pre-trial surveys 50% of students preferred immediate feedback, 22% delayed, and 28% had no preference. There was no significant differences in overall student grades between groups (88.4% immediate vs. 86.6% delayed, p=0.7) or in grades over time (p=0.276).

Conclusions: Although more students preferred immediate feedback, overall grades did not differ based on method of feedback. 


Keywords

ssessment, Counselling Skills, Standardised Patients


Full Text:

PDF

References

Bokken L., Linssen T., Scherpbier A., van der Vleuten, C. & Rethans J. (2009). Feedback by simulated patients in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review of the literature. Medical Education, 43, 202-210.

Epstein M.L., Lazarus, A.D., Calvano, T.B., Matthews, K.A., Hendel, R.A., Epstein, B.B. & Brosvic, G.M. (2002). Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. Psychological Record, 52(2), 187-202.

Gums, T.H., Kleppinger, E.L. & Urick, B.Y. (2014). Rickles, N.M., Tieu, P., Myers, L., Galal, S. & Chung, V. (2009). The impact of a standardized patient program on student learning of communication skills. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(1), 1-10.

Lally, S. (2013). Practice teaching and the importance of feedback. Community Practitioner, 86(1), 27-30.

Linedecker, S.J., Barner, J., Ridings-Myhra, J., Garza, A., Lopez, D. & McIntyre, W. (2017). Development of a direct observation of procedural skills rubric for fourth- year pharmacy students in ambulatory care rotations. American Journal of Health Systems Pharmacy, 74(5 Suppl. 1), S17-S23.

Marie, D.M., Schonder, K.S., Meyer, S.M. & Hall, D.L. (2015). Changes in student performance and confidence with a standardized patient and standardized colleague interprofessional activity. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(5), 1-5.

Mesquita, A.R., Lyra, D.P., Jr, Brito, G.C., Balisa-Rocha, B.J., Aguiar, P.M. & de Almeida Neto, A.C. (2010). Developing communication skills in pharmacy: A systematic review of the use of simulated patient methods. Patient Education and Counseling, 78, 143-148.

Mullet, H.G., Butler, A.C., Verdin, B., Von Borries, R. & Marsh, E.J. (2014). Delaying feedback promotes transfer of knowledge despite student preferences to receive feedback immediately. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 222-229.

Ottis, E. & Gregory, G. (2016). An interprofessional nursing and pharmacy student simulation in acute pain management. Pharmacy Education, 16(1), 18-25.

Pfeiffer, C.A., Kosowicz, L.Y., Holmboe, E. & Wang, Y. (2005). Face-to-face clinical skills feedback: lessons from the analysis of standardised patients’ work. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17(3), 254-256.

Ramani S. & Krackov, S.K. (2012). Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Medical Teacher, 34, 797-791.

Sarah, S., Dunn, B., Blake, E. & Phillips, C. (2015). Incorporating standardized colleague simulations in a clinical assessment course and evaluating the impact on interprofessional communication. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(4), 1-8.

Sinha, N. & Glass, A.L. (2015). Delayed, but not immediate, feedback after multiple-choice questions increases performance on a subsequent short-answer, but not multiple-choice, exam: Evidence for the dual-process theory of memory. Journal of General Psychology, 142(2), 118-134.

Thornock, T.A. (2016). How the timing of performance feedback impacts individual performance. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 55, 1-11.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
article/comments.tpl article/footer.tpl