article/article.tpl

An assessment of college of pharmacy promotion committees and criteria for promotion for pharmacy practice faculty

Mark L. Glover, Greciela M. Armayor

Abstract

A survey identifying the composition of promotion committees and criteria for promotion was mailed to the respective dean of 89 US Schools of Pharmacy. A total of 61 (69%) surveys were returned. The mean number of committee members was 6.3 with the majority (80%) consisting of members from multiple departments. Professors and associate professors were the most frequently reported committee members at 88.5 and 84.6%, respectively. A mean number of 4.5 external reviewers were used by the committees. Of the criteria assessed for promotion, scholarly activities were most commonly cited with service being the least considered activity. No significant differences were observed between tenure and non-tenure faculty. Promotion committees consist predominantly of senior faculty with representation from multiple departments. Excelling in scholarly activities appears to be the major determinant in being awarded promotion from assistant to associate professor.


Keywords

Faculty, pharmacy practice, promotion committee, tenure and non-tenure faculty


Full Text:

PDF

References

Angstadt, C. N., Nieman, L. Z., & Morahan, P. S. (1998). Strategies to expand the definition of scholarship for the health professions. Journal of Allied Health, 27, 157–161.

Barnett, C. W., & Matthews, H. W. (1998). Current procedures used to evaluate teaching in schools of pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 62, 388–391.

Glover, M. L., & Deziel-Evans, L. (2002). Comparison of the responsibilities of tenure versus non-tenure track pharmacy practice faculty. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 66, 388–391.

Glover, M. L., & Armayor, G. M. (2004). Expectations and orientation activities of first-year pharmacy practice faculty. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68, Article 87.

Jacobs, M. B. (1993). Faculty status for clinician – educators: Guidelines for evaluation and promotion. Academic Medicine, 68, 126 – 128.

Jungnickel, P. W. (1997). Scholarly performance and related variables: A comparison of pharmacy practice faculty and departmental chairpersons. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 61, 34–44.

Martin, R. E., Perrier, D., & Trinca, C. E. (1983). A planned program for evaluation and development of clinical pharmacy faculty. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 47, 102 – 107.

Wolgang, A. P., Gupchup, G. V., & Plake, K. S. (1995). Relative importance of performance criteria in promotion and tenure decisions: Perceptions of pharmacy faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 59, 342–347.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
article/comments.tpl article/footer.tpl