article/article.tpl

Computer-based, online summative assessment in undergraduate pharmacy teaching: The Manchester experience

Harmesh Aojula, Jill Barber, Rod Cullen, Julie Andrews

Abstract

Computer-based assessment (CBA) has many advantages for staff and students in higher education. Although we have successfully used diagnostic and formative CBA for a number of years, the introduction of summative assessments raised additional concerns about development time, academic rigour, security and organisation. To explore these issues, a pilot study was set up to assess the running of online (summative) CBA for 240 students taking a first year course in Cell Biology and Biochemistry. We have compared the scores obtained from computer-based marking, with those obtained from: (a) optical mark readers; and (b) traditional hand-marking of scripts. Computer-based marking of text matching questions was initially compromised by spelling errors but these were reduced to an acceptable (, 1%) level by introducing an online subject-specific list of correctly-spelled options. The development and evaluation of secure online examination procedures is also discussed. We conclude that, with these improvements, online CBA can be used successfully for a range of summative assessments in undergraduate Pharmacy courses.


Keywords

Assessment, CBA, online, pharmacy, summative, WebCT


Full Text:

PDF

References

Andrew, M. (2000). Use of web-based learning to teach pharmacy undergraduates. Pharmaceutical Journal, 265, 558–562.

Howarth, J., Messing, J., & Altas, I. (2004). Delivering online examinations: A case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 5, 5.3.

Olson, B. L., & McDonald, J. L (2004). Influence of online formative assessment upon student learning in biomedical science courses. Journal of Dental Education, 68, 656–659.

Pain, D., & Le Heron, J. (2003). WebCT and online assessment: The best thing since SOAP? Education Technology and Society, 6, 62–71.

Pitt, S. J., & Gunn, A. (2004). The value of computer based formative assessment in undergraduate biological science teaching. Bioscience Education e-journal, 3, 3.1.

Thelwall, M. (2000). Computer-based assessment: A versatile educational tool. Computers and Education, 34, 37–49.

Ward, J. P. T., Gordon, J., Field, M. J., & Lehmann, H. P. (2001). Communication and information technology in medical education. Lancet, 357, 792–796.

Zakrzewski, S., & Steven, C. (2000). A model for computer-based assessment: The catherine wheel principle. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 201–215.

Zakrzewski, S., & Steven, C. (2003). Computer-based assessment: Quality assurance issues, the hub of the wheel. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 609–623.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
article/comments.tpl article/footer.tpl