RESEARCH ARTICLE: Peer marking of OSCEs within a UK pharmacy undergraduate programme - student views
Keywords:Formative, Near-peer, OSCEs, Peer marking, Pharmacy student
Objective: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) assess competencies in undergraduate pharmacy students. Students in senior years marked those in the year below during a formative OSCE.
Method: The study explored the views of students who marked and had been marked by peers via an online survey. Ethical approval was obtained.
Results: 115 (36%) of markers and 114 (35%) of those who were marked responded. Most students who were marked agreed that it was a positive experience and were comfortable receiving feedback from their peers; there were varied views on student marker consistency and how they were not equivalent to staff markers. Student markers felt prepared and confident giving feedback and marks. Markers felt it was a beneficial experience. Working collaboratively with another marker and assessing more than one student was valuable to allow discussion and inform their own OSCE.
Conclusion: Overall, students supported this initiative, which has now been embedded into the undergraduate programme.
Brown, C., Ross, S., Cleland, J., & Walsh, K. (2015). Money makes the medical assessment world go round: the cost of components of a summative final year Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Medical Teacher, 37, 653-659. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1033389
Burgess, A., Clark, T., Chapman, R., & Mellis, C. (2013) Senior medical students as peer examiners in an OSCE. Medical Teacher, 35, 58-62. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.731101
Chenot, J. F., Simmenroth-Nayda, A., Koch, A., Fischer, T., Scherer, M., Emmert, B., Stanske, B., Kochen, M., & Himmel, W. (2007) Can student tutors act as examiners in an objective structured clinical examination? Medical Education. 41, 1032-1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02895.x
Cushing, A., Abbott, S., Lothian, D., Hall, A., & Westwood, O. (2011) Peer feedback as an aid to learning – What do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now! Medical Teacher, 33, e105-112. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.542522
Davies, A., Macleod, R., Bennett-Britton, I., McElnay, P., Bakhbakhi, D., & Sansom, J. (2016) E-learning and near-peer teaching in electrocardiogram education: a randomised trial. The Clinical Teacher, 13, 227-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12421
Fletcher, A., & Day, R. (2015) A peer-led mock OSCE improves subsequent performance: What about objectivity? Medical Teacher, 37, 886-886. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009432
General Pharmaceutical Council (2011). Future pharmacists. Standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists. Available at: https://www.pharmacyregulation.org/sites/default/files/document/gphc_future_pharmacists_may_2011.pdf
General Pharmaceutical Council (2020). Pharmacist education and training. Available at: https://www.pharmacyregulation.org/education/pharmacist-education
Harden, R. M., Stevenson, M., Downne, W., & Wilson, G. (1975). Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). British Medical Journal, 1, 447-451. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447
Harris, I., & Miller, W. (1990) Feedback in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination by medical students serving as patients, examiners and teachers. Academic Medicine, 65, 433-434. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199007000-00002
Iblher, P., Zupanic, M., Karsten, J., & Brauer, K. (2015) May student examiners be reasonable substitute examiners for faculty in an undergraduate OSCE on medical emergencies? Medical Teacher, 37, 374-378. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.956056
Kelly, M., & Murphy, A. (2004). An evaluation of the cost of designing, delivering and assessing an undergraduate communication skills module. Medical Teacher, 26, 610-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590400005475
Khan, R., Payne, M., & Chahine, S. (2017). Peer assessment in the objective structured clinical examination. Medical Teacher, 39, 745-756. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1309375
Khaw, C., & Raw, L. (2016) The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 188-194. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b
Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills /competence /performance. Academic Medicine, 65, 563–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045
Moineau, G., Power, B., Pion, A., Wood, T., & Humphrey-Murto, S. (2011) Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE. Medical Education, 45, 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03800.x
Nelson, A. J., Nelson, S.V., Linn, A. M. J., Raw, L., Kildea, H. B., & Tonkin, A. L. (2013). Tomorrow's educators … today? Implementing near-peer teaching for medical students. Medical Teacher, 35, 2, 156-159. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.737961
Ogden, G. R., Green, M., & Ker, J. S. (2000). The use of interprofessional peer examiners in an objective structured clinical examination: Can dental students act as examiners? British Dental Journal, 189, 160-164. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800711
Quero Munoz, L., O’Byrne, C., Pugsley, J., & Austin, Z. (2005) Reliability, validity, and generalizability of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for assessment of entry-to-practice in pharmacy. Pharmacy Education, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15602210400025347
Saunders, A., Say, R., Visentin, D., & McCann, D. (2019). Evaluation of a collaborative testing approach to objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in undergraduate nurse education: A survey study. Nurse Education in Practice, 35, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.01.009
Young, I., Montgomery, K., Kearns, P., Hayward, S., & Mellanby, E. (2014). The benefits of a peer-assisted mock OSCE. The Clinical Teacher, 11, 214-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12112
Zhang, N., & Rabatsky, A. (2015). Effects of test stress during an objective structured clinical examination. The Journal of Chiropractic Education, 29, 139-144. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-14-17