Developing a way to improve communication between healthcare professionals in secondary care

Authors

  • Kristina Åström Academic Department of Pharmacy, Barts and the London NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
  • Catherine Duggan Academic Department of Pharmacy, Barts and the London NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK
  • Ian Bates Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK

Keywords:

Communication between HCPs, risk management and communication, joint communication note, day-to-day communication

Abstract

Aims and objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify day-to-day communication problems between healthcare professionals (HCPs) within secondary care and to investigate ways to improve communication: an area identified by the Trust’s board that needed improvement.
Setting: The study was undertaken at a London Teaching Hospital on a General Emergency Medical ward and all stages of the study involved representatives from medicine, nursing, pharmacy and therapy.
Methods: Communication between HCPs was recorded using a standard pro-forma to provide insights into staff communication, interactions and failures, and ways to improve communication. The perceptions of the HCPs were explored and compared through one-to-one interviews and a focus group identified ways to overcome these communication problems. The HCPs identified the need for a specific place to communicate, to be able to request comments and decisions from fellow HCPs, and to follow up on monitoring. They described this as a joint communication note (JCN).
Results: A total of 29 HCPs participated in the study (8 doctors, 12 nurses, 4 pharmacists and 5 therapists). All HCPs were involved in the observation phase, 8 were interviewed and 8 took part in the focus group. Communication problems included incomplete documentation; difficulties contacting other HCPs; no formal methods or places to provide information or ways to follow up if it had been actioned.
Conclusions: The HCPs felt that the JCN would be beneficial and would make communication easier long term and definitely highlighted existing problems with communication. The differences between the professions highlighted the need to account for professional and behavioural differences when implementing any future developments in communication.

References

Astrom, K., Duggan, C., & Bates, I. Evaluating an intervention to improve communication between healthcare professionals within secondary care. Pharmacy Education.

Berko, A., & Wolvin, D. (1989). Communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Cambridgeshire Health Authority. (2000). Methotrexate Toxicity. An inquiry into the death of a Cambridgeshire patient in April. London: HMSO.

Davis, C. (2000). Getting health care professionals to work together: There’s more to collaboration than simply working side by side. British Medical Journal, 320, 1021–1022.

Department of Health. (1998). The new NHS: Modern, dependable. London: HMSO.

Department of Health. (1999). The NHS: A first class service. London: HMSO.

Epstein, R. M. (1995). Communication between primary care physicians and consultants. Arch Family Medicine, 4(5), 403–409.

Finch, J. (2000). Interprofessional education and team working: A view from the education providers. British Medical Journal, 321,

– 1140.

Gosbee, J. (1998). Communication among health professionals. British Medical Journal, 318, 642–646.

Lyons, J., & Khot, A. (2000). Managing information overload: Developing an electronic directory. British Medical Journal, 320, 160.

Lyons, R., Payne, C., McCabe, M., & Fielder, C. (1998). Legibility of doctors’ handwriting: Quantitative comparative study. British Medical Journal, 317, 863–864.

Makaram, S. (1995). Interprofessional cooperation. Medical Education, 65–69.

NHS Executive. (1999). Learning to manage health information. In A Theme for Clinical Education. London: HMSO.

Rigby, M., Fosstro ̈m, J., Roberts, R., & Wyatt, J. (2001). Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services. British Medical

Journal, 323, 552–556.

The Audit Commission. (1995). Setting the records straight. London: HMSO.

Wyatt, J., & Wright, P. (1998). Design should help use of patients’ data. The Lancet, 352, 1375–1378.

Downloads

How to Cite

Åström, K., Duggan, C., & Bates, I. (2018). Developing a way to improve communication between healthcare professionals in secondary care. Pharmacy Education, 7(3). Retrieved from https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/130

Issue

Section

Research Article