IAI CONFERENCE: A pharmacoeconomic study: cost-utility analysis of modern wound dressings vs conventional wound dressings in patients with diabetic foot ulcer

Authors

  • Cyntiya Rahmawati Muhammadiyah University of Mataram, Indonesia
  • Baiq Leny Nopitasari Muhammadiyah University of Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2021.212.7176

Keywords:

Cost-utility analysis, Diabetic foot ulcer, DQOL questionnaire, Pharmacoeconomics, Wound dressing

Abstract

Introduction: Duration of treatment and outcome of therapy of diabetic foot ulcers are some of the factors that affect the quality of life and will require higher medical costs.

Aim: This study aimed to choose an alternative wound dressing that provides the best utility at the most cost-efficient.   

Methods: The research method used was pharmacoeconomics with a patient’s perspective.   

Results: The results showed the mean cost of modern wound dressings per visit was IDR 347,131, while that of conventional wound dressings was IDR 47,140. The quality of life with modern vs conventional wound dressing was significantly different (p < 0.05). The incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) value was IDR 22,813 per quality of life (QoL).    

Conclusions: This study showed that modern wound dressings provide a higher quality of life at a higher cost. Indeed, it cost more than IDR 22,813 to change from conventional to modern wound dressings and increase 1 unit of quality of life, but patients obtained an additional 13.15 quality of life.

Author Biographies

Cyntiya Rahmawati, Muhammadiyah University of Mataram, Indonesia

Department of Pharmacy

Baiq Leny Nopitasari, Muhammadiyah University of Mataram, Indonesia

Department of Pharmacy

References

Allenet, B., Parre, F., Lebrun, T., Carr, L., Posnett, J., Martini, J., et al. (2000). Cost-Effectiveness Model of Dermagraft For The Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer in The French Context. Diabetes & Metabolism (Paris), 125-132. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10804327/

Eristina. (2017). Analisis Biaya Medik Langsung dan Utilitas Pasien Diabetes Melitus Rawat Jalan Di RSUD Karanganyar. Surakarta: Tesis Program S2 Farmasi Fakultas Farmasi Universitas Setia Budi

Hastuti, R. T. (2008). Faktor-Faktor Risiko Ulkus Diabetika Pada Penderita Diabetes Mellitus (Studi Kasus di RSUD Dr. Moewardi Surakarta). Semarang: Tesis Magister Epidemiologi Universitas Diponegoro. Available at: http://eprints.undip.ac.id/18866/1/Rini_Tri_Hastuti.pdf

Hilton, J., Williams, D., Beuker, B., Miller, D., & Harding, K. (2004). Wound Dressing in Diabetic Foot Disease. Clinical Infectious Disease, 39 (2). 100-103. https://doi.org/10.1086/383270

Jeffcoate, W. e. (2009). Randomised controlled trial of the use of three dressing preparations in the management of chronic ulceration of the foot in diabetes. NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, 13 (54). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13540

Jones, V., Grey, J., & Harding, K. (2006). Abc of Wound Healing: Wound Dressing. British Medical Journal, 332 (7544). 777-780. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777

Kronert, G. R. (2016). Efficiency in wound care: The impact of introducing a new foam dressing in community practice. EWMA Journal Change, Opportunities and Challenges Wound Management in Changing Health Care Systems, 16 (2). 7-12. Available at: https://ewma.org/fileadmin/user_upload/EWMA_Journal_nov2016_site-1_Final_web.pdf

McGuire. (2014). 90-Rated Wound Products for Cost Effective Wound Care. The Annual Clinical Conference on Collaborative

Minarningtyas, A., & Tami, A. (2018). Studi Komparatif: Perawatan Luka Konvensional dan Modern. Jurnal Gema Keperawatan, 11 (2). 141-152. https://doi.org/10.33992/jgk.v11i2.636

Misnadiarly. (2006). Diabetes Mellitus: Gangren, Ulcer, Infeksi. Mengenal Gejala, Menanggulangi, dan Mencegah Komplikasi, Edisi 1. Jakarta: Pustaka Populer Obor

Nurhaida. (2017). Gambaran Efektivitas Perawatan Luka Diabetik Menggunakan Modern Dressing dan Konvensional di Asri Woud Care Center dan RSU Martha Friska Medan Tahun 2015. Jurnal Ilmiah PANNMED, 11 (3). 181-186. https://doi.org/10.36911/pannmed.v11i3.98

Preethi, S. &. (2019). Comparative study of efficacy and cost effectiveness of topical sucralfate and conventional dressings in diabetic ulcers. International Journal of Surgery Science, 3 (4). 435-438. Available at: https://www.surgeryscience.com/articles/280/3-4-64-351.pdf

Purnomo, S., Dwiningsih, S., & Lestari, K. (2014). Efektivitas Penyembuhan Luka Menggunakan NaCl 0,9% Dan Hydrogel Pada Ulkus Diabetes Mellitus di RSU Kota Semarang. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional II PPNI. PPNI Jawa Tengah. Available at: https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/psn12012010/article/view/1136

Rahman, F. (2016). Analisis Biaya Layanan Diabetes Melitus dengan Komplikasi dan Faktor Penentu Inefisiensi Penanganan Diabetes Melitus di Rawat Inap RSUD Banyuasin Tahun 2015. Jurnal Administrasi Rumah Sakit Indonesia, 3 (1). Available at: http://journal.fkm.ui.ac.id/arsi/article/view/2210

Riani, & Handayani, F. (2017). Perbandingan Efektivitas Perawatan Luka Modern “Moist Wound Healing” Dan Terapi Komplementer “NaCl 0,9% + Madu Asli” Terhadap Penyembuhan Luka Kaki Diabetik Derajat II Di RSUD Bangkinang. Jurnal Ners Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusi, 1 (2). 98-107. Available at: https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/ners/article/view/121

Rondonuwu, Y., Mambo, C., & Posangi, J. (2020). Perhitungan Biaya Satuan Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 Dengan Komplikasi Ulkus Kaki Diabetik di RSUP Prof. Dr. R.D. Kandou Manado Periode September-November 2019. Jurnal Kedokteran Klinik (JKK), 4 (1). Available at: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jkk/article/view/27550

Rubin, R., & Peyrot, M. (1999). Quality of Life and Diabetes. Diabetes Metabolism Research and Reviews, 15. 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-7560(199905/06)15:3<205::AID-DMRR29>3.0.CO;2-O

Setiawan, D., Endarti, D., & Suwantika, A. (2017). Farmakoekonomi Modelling. Purwokerto: UMP Press

Tiara, S. (2012). Efektifitas Perawatan Luka Kaki Diabetic Menggunakan Balutan Modern di RSUP Sanglah Denpasar dan Klinik Dhalia Care Bali. Denpasar: PSIK Universitas Udayana Bali. Available at: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/coping/article/download/6453/4968/

Utami, D., Karim, D., & Agrina. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Hidup Pasien Diabetes Mellitus dengan Ulkus Diabetikum. JOM PSIK, 1(2). 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v2i1.7048

Vuagnat, H. &. (2016). The WAWLC wound care kit for less-resourced countries: A key tool for modern adapted wound care. EWMA Journal Change, Opportunities and Challenges Wound Management in Changing Health Care Systems. 16 (2). 27-33. Available at: https://ewma.org/fileadmin/user_upload/EWMA_Journal_nov2016_site-1_Final_web.pdf

World Health Organization. (2020, June 8). Diabetes. Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes

Yusra, A. (2011). Hubungan Antara Dukungan Keluarga dengan Kualitas Hidup Pasien Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2 di Poliklinik Penyakit Dalam Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Fatmawati Jakarta. Depok: Tesis FIK UI. Available at: http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20280162-T%20Aini%20Yusra.pdf

Downloads

Published

28-07-2021

How to Cite

Rahmawati, C. ., & Nopitasari, B. L. . (2021). IAI CONFERENCE: A pharmacoeconomic study: cost-utility analysis of modern wound dressings vs conventional wound dressings in patients with diabetic foot ulcer . Pharmacy Education, 21(2), p. 71–76. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2021.212.7176

Issue

Section

Conference Proceedings