PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION: Virtual patients in clinical decision making – A design-based research approach

Authors

  • Nataly Martini University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Ashwini Datt University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2022.221.129141

Keywords:

Clinical decision-making, Curriculum, Design-based research, Patient simulation, Pharmacy education

Abstract

This paper reports on a longitudinal, design-based research (DBR) study to promote clinical decision making using a virtual patient (VP) simulation for emergency renal care. The VP was piloted with pharmacy students, then offered as an interprofessional learning exercise for pharmacy and medical students, before being introduced as part of the curriculum.  In this paper, the DBR framework used to design, implement and evaluate the VP is described. The iterative changes made and implications for the integration of virtual patient simulation in the pharmacy curriculum are discussed.

References

Amiel, T., & Reeves, T.C. (2008). Design-Based Research and Educational Technology: Rethinking Technology and the Research Agenda. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29–40

Banning, M. (2008). Clinical reasoning and its application to nursing: Concepts and research studies. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(3), 177–183. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.06.004

Baumann-Birkbeck, L., Florentina, F., Karatas, O., Sun, J., Tang, T., Thaung, V., McFarland, A., Bernaitis, N., Khan, S.A., Grant, G., & Anoopkumar-Dukie, S. (2017). Appraising the role of the virtual patient for therapeutics health education. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(5), 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.05.012

Cela-Ranilla, J.M., Esteve-Mon, F.M., Esteve-González, V., & Gisbert-Cervera, M. (2014). Developing self-management and teamwork using digital games in 3D simulations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.754

Chittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: Motivations, issues, opportunities. Computers & Education, 49(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.002

Combs, C.D., & Combs, P.F. (2019). Emerging Roles of Virtual Patients in the Age of AI. American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, 21(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.153

Conrad, F.G., Couper, M.P., Tourangeau, R., & Peytchev, A. (2010). The impact of progress indicators on task completion. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.03.001

Cook, D.A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A.T., Erwin, P.J., & Hamstra, S.J. (2011). Technology-Enhanced Simulation for Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306(9), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1234

Cook, D.A., & Triola, M.M. (2009). Virtual patients: A critical literature review and proposed next steps. Medical Education, 43(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03286.x

Damassa, D.A.; Sitko, T.D. (2010) Simulation Technologies in Higher Education: Uses, Trends, and Implications; Research Bulletin 3; EDUCAUSE Centre for Applied Research: Boulder, CO, USA. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2010/2/simulation-technologies-in-higher-education-uses-trends-and-implications

Fletcher, J.D., & Wind, A.P. (2013). Cost Considerations in Using Simulations for Medical Training. Military Medicine, 178(suppl_10), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00258

Guze, P.A. (2015). Using Technology to Meet the Challenges of Medical Education. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 126, 260–270

Hege, I., Kononowicz, A.A., & Adler, M. (2017). A Clinical Reasoning Tool for Virtual Patients: Design-Based Research Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research Medical Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.8100

Hege, I., Kononowicz, A.A., Tolks, D., Edelbring, S., & Kuehlmeyer, K. (2016). A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0655-8

Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., & Oliver, R. (2006). Authentic Tasks Online: A synergy among learner, task, and technology. Distance Education, 27(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789639

Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N. (2008). Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann

Hofmann, B. (2009). Why simulation can be efficient: On the preconditions of efficient learning in complex technology based practices. BMC Medical Education, 9(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-48

Issenberg, S.B., Mcgaghie, W.C., Petrusa, E.R., Gordon, D.L., & Scalese, R.J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924

Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Jeong, S. Y.-S., Noble, D., Norton, C.A., Roche, J., & Hickey, N. (2010). The ‘five rights’ of clinical reasoning: An educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically ‘at risk’ patients. Nurse Education Today, 30(6), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.020

Lyons, J. (2012) Learning with technology: Theoretical foundations underpinning simulations in higher education. In Proceedings of the Future Challenges, Sustainable Futures, Ascilite, Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 582–586

Martini, N., Datt, A., Bhargava, A., & Webster, C. (2015). Ready to Practice? Learning skills using digital simulated patients. 1527–1532. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/152197/

Martini, N., Farmer, K., Patil, S., Tan, G., Wang, C., Wong, L., & Webster, C.S. (2019). Designing and Evaluating a Virtual Patient Simulation—The Journey from Uniprofessional to Interprofessional Learning. Information, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10010028

McGaghie, W.C., Issenberg, S.B., Petrusa, E.R., & Scalese, R.J. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Medical Education, 44(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x

Myers, B.A. (1985). The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces. Association for Computing Machinery Special Interest Group on Computer & Human Interaction Bulletin, 16(4), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/1165385.317459

Tanner, CA. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20060601-04

Thomas, D.R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

Tietze, K.J. (2019). Clinical reasoning model for pharmacy students. The Clinical Teacher, 16(3), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12944

Tiffen, J., Corbridge, S.J., & Slimmer, L. (2014). Enhancing Clinical Decision Making: Development of a Contiguous Definition and Conceptual Framework. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(5), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.01.006

Tworek, J., Coderre, S., Wright, B., & McLaughlin, K. (2010). Virtual Patients: ED-2 band-aid or valuable asset in the learning portfolio? Academic Medicine, 85. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c4f8bf

Wang, F., & Hannafin, M.J. (2005). Design-Based Research and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.

Webster, C.S., Hallett, C., Torrie, J., Verstappen, A., Barrow, M., Moharib, M.M., & Weller, J.M. (2018). Advanced Cardiac Life Support Training in Interprofessional Teams of Undergraduate Nursing and Medical Students Using Mannequin-Based Simulation. Medical Science Educator, 28(1), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0523-0

Whitton, N. J. (2007). An investigation into the potential of collaborative computer game-based learning in Higher Education. [PhD thesis, Edinburgh Napier University]. http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/4281

Wolcott, M.D., Lobczowski, N.G., Lyons, K., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2019). Design-based research: Connecting theory and practice in pharmacy educational intervention research. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.12.002

Downloads

Published

2022-02-11

How to Cite

Martini, N., & Datt, A. . (2022). PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION: Virtual patients in clinical decision making – A design-based research approach. Pharmacy Education, 22(1), p. 129–141. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2022.221.129141

Issue

Section

Programme Description