PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION: Online OSCE in pharmacy education: Strategies to preserve academic integrity of high-stakes assessment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2022.221.165171

Keywords:

Academic integrity, Cheating, Collusion, Online OSCE, Pharmacy education

Abstract

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a highly valued performance-based competency assessment that is extensively employed in medical and health professions education. In pharmacy undergraduate programmes, OSCE is an integral component of the curriculum, constituting both formative and summative assessments of the course. When the COVID-19 pandemic posed an overarching challenge in the delivery of face-to-face teaching and learning activities, academic institutions around the world ineluctably transitioned to online mode of education. Conducting OSCEs on virtual platforms presents its unique set of challenges. In the absence of physical isolation and invigilation of students, the risk of cheating and collusion is particularly high during virtual OSCEs. With the experience of conducting high-stakes OSCEs on virtual platforms at two different campuses simultaneously, the authors outline several strategies that can be implemented to ensure the academic integrity of the assessment.

Author Biographies

Sunanthiny Krishnan, Monash University Malaysia, Malaysia

School of Pharmacy

Sara Chuang, Monash University, Parkville, Australia

Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Vivienne Mak, Monash University, Parkville, Australia

Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

References

Al-Haqan, A., Al-Taweel, D., Koshy, S., & Alghanem, S. (2021). Evolving to objective structured clinical exams (OSCE): transitional experience in an undergraduate pharmacy program in Kuwait. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 29(1):104 -113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.12.013

American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), Holt, S. L., Lau, M. S., Wong, F. L., Attridge, R. T., Ho, M., Morris, J. L., Rutledge, E. D., Sapko, M. M., Tu, X., & Vlasimsky, T. B. (2009). Tenets of professionalism for pharmacy students. Pharmacotherapy, 29(6), 757–759. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.29.6.757

Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. Longmans Green

Brown, C. (2015). Should we be “quarantining” students for objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs)? Medical Teacher, 37(1):98-99. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.940879

Corbo, M., Patel, J.P., Abdel Tawab, R., & Davies, J.G. (2006). Evaluating clinical skills of undergraduate pharmacy students using objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). Pharmacy Education, 6(1):53–58

Examity (2021). Online proctoring on your terms. https://www.examity.com

ExamSoft (2021). Strengthen exam integrity with digital monitoring. http://examsoft.com/solutions/exam-monitor

Ghouri, A., Boachie, C., McDowall, S., Parle, J., Ditchfield, C.A., McConnachie, A., Walters, M.R., & Ghouri, N. (2018). Gaining an advantage by sitting an OSCE after your peers: a retrospective study. Medical Teacher, 40(11):1136-1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1458085

Gotzmann, A., De Champlain, A., Homayra, F., Fotheringham, A., De Vries, I., Forgie, M., & Pugh, D. (2017). Cheating in OSCEs: the impact of simulated security breaches on OSCE performance. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 29(1):52–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1202832

Harden, R.M., Stevenson, M., Downie, W.W., & Wilson, G.M. (1975). Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. British Medical Journal, 1(5955):447–451. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447

Hopwood, J., Myers, G., Sturrock, A. (2021). Twelve tips for conducting a virtual OSCE. Medical Teacher, 43(6):633-636. http://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1830961

Kharbat, F.F., Abu Daabes, A.S. (2021). E-proctored exams during the COVID-19 pandemic: a close understanding. Education and Information Technologies, 1-17. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10458-7

Kristina, S.A., Gustriawanto, N., Rokhman, M.R., Aditama, H., & Sari, I.P. (2018). Students’ first experience with objective structured clinical examination in a pharmacy school in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 8(9):102-106. http://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2018.8915

Li, M., Luo, L., Sikdar, S., Nizam, N.I., Gao, S., Shan, H., Kruger, M., Kruger, U., Mohamed, H., Xia, L., & Wang, G. (2021). Optimized collusion prevention for online exams during social distancing. NPJ Science of Learning, 6:5. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00083-3

Mak, V., Sandhu, A.K., & Krishnan, S. (2020). Using simulation to teach methods for improving patient literacy about medicines. Pharmacy, 8(4):192. http://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8040192

Mallinder, A., & Martini, N. (2021). Exploring community pharmacists’ clinical decision-making using think aloud and protocol analysis. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.002

Noonan, Z., Boyle, J.G., Pope, L., Ditchfield, C., Leach, J.P., & McDowall, S. (2020). Quarantining the OSCE: reflections on the Glasgow experience. Clinical Teacher, 17: 94-97. http://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12993

Odero, T.A., & Oloko, M.A. (2013). Effect of online registration on exam performance in Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education enrolment. A case of Sotik District, Kenya. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(7):117-127

Parks, R., Warren, P., Boyd, K., Cameron, H., Cumming, A., & Lloyd-Jones, G. (2006). The objective structured clinical examination and student collusion: marks do not tell the whole truth. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(12):734–738. http://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.015446

Patrício, M.F., Julião, M., Fareleira, F., & Carneiro, A.V. (2013). Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education? Medical Teacher, 35(6):503–514. http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.774330

Prettyman, A.V., Knight, E.P., & Allison, T.E. (2018). Objective structured clinical examination from virtually anywhere. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 14(8): e157–e163. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2018.05.007

ProctorU (2021). The leading proctoring solution for online exams. http://www.proctoru.com

Savage, A., Minshew, L.M., Anksorus, H.N., & McLaughlin, J.E. (2021). Remote OSCE experience: what first year pharmacy students liked, learned, and suggested for future implementations. Pharmacy, 9(1):62. http://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010062

Sheela, S., Vanitha, V., Anne Ramya, T., & Sobana, B. (2020). Detection of impersonation in online examination. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(10): 2103-2109. http://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.10.365

Shirwaikar, A. (2015). Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmacy education - a trend. Pharmacy Practice, 13(4):627. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2015.04.627

Wilkinson, T., Fontaine, S., & Egan, T. (2003). Was breach of examination security unfair in an objective structured clinical examination? A critical incident. Medical Teacher, 25(1):42–46. http://doi.org/10.1080/0142159021000061413

Zoom (2021). Authentication Profiles for meetings and webinars. https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/360037117472-Authentication-Profiles-for-meetings-and-webinars2021

Downloads

Published

2022-02-25

How to Cite

Krishnan, S., Chuang, S., & Mak, V. (2022). PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION: Online OSCE in pharmacy education: Strategies to preserve academic integrity of high-stakes assessment. Pharmacy Education, 22(1), p. 165–171. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2022.221.165171

Issue

Section

Programme Description