e-Learning in Continuing Pharmacy Education is effective and just as accepted as on-site learning

Authors

  • Krzysztof Nesterowicz Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland. (former) & National University of Public Service, Budapest
  • Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad Karolinska Institutet
  • Samuel Edelbring Karolinska Institutet

Keywords:

Continuing Pharmacy Education, e-Learning, Pre-Test, Post-Test

Abstract

Background: Educators report advantages of e-learning: improved open access to education, time and place flexibility of e-courses. There are also limitations of e-learning: high dropout rates, lack of management oversight, lack of student support, lack of sufficient interaction between tutor and users.

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare remote courses to on-site courses based on knowledge change and level of acceptance.

Methods: A course was provided using two modalities: an e-course (intervention) and an on-site course (control). Participants were tested to evaluate changes in knowledge. Also, the acceptance questionnaire was utilised.

Results: Both intervention (n=541) and control groups (n=251) increased their scores on the knowledge test. However, the scores did not differ between groups (p>0.05). Both groups were equally satisfied with their respective teaching modalities (p=0.1).

Conclusion: It was noticed that younger pharmacists attended e-learning courses more often. The study showed that e-learning was just as effective in conveying knowledge as on-site learning. Learners in both groups were equally satisfied. 

Author Biographies

Krzysztof Nesterowicz, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland. (former) & National University of Public Service, Budapest

Department of Radioligands, Medical College, Faculty of Pharmacy (former) & Doctoral School of Public Administration Sciences, National University of Public Service

Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad, Karolinska Institutet

Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS)

 

Samuel Edelbring, Karolinska Institutet

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME)

References

Ahmad, Z. (2010) Virtual Education System (Current Myth & Future Reality in Pakistan). Entrepreneurial Tutors.

Butorac, M., Nebic, Z. & Nemcanin, D. (2011) Blended E-learning in Higher Education: Research on Students’ Perspective. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 8, 409-429.

Carswell, A.D. & Venkatesh, V. (2002) Learner outcomes in an asynchronous distance education environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, 475–494.

Dalsgaard, C. (2013) Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems, eurodl.org. University of Aarhus.

Frankola, K. (2001) Why online learners drop out. Workforce.

Kirkpatrick, D.L. & Kirkpatrick, J.D. (2006) Evaluating Training Programs. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett- Koehler Publishers.

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Poland. (2001) Law from September 6th 2001. Pharmaceutical Law, Article 89e, 2001.

Nesterowicz, K. (2012) Research on the effectiveness of transferring skills with the use of e-learning in the precision of blood pressure measurement conducted by pharmacists. Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Nauki Ścisłe, 2/2012 (5), 7-17.

Nesterowicz, K., Librowski, T. & Edelbring, S. (2014) Validating e-learning in continuing pharmacy education: user acceptance and knowledge change. BMC Medical Education 2014, 14, 3.

Downloads

Published

02-03-2015

How to Cite

Nesterowicz, K., Fereshtehnejad, S.-M., & Edelbring, S. (2015). e-Learning in Continuing Pharmacy Education is effective and just as accepted as on-site learning. Pharmacy Education, 15. Retrieved from https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/326

Issue

Section

Research Article