RESEARCH ARTICLE: Pharmacy students’ and faculty attitudes regarding consumerism in academia

Authors

  • Melany Patricia Puglisi Chicago State University, Illinois, USA. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2823-9932
  • Rahul Garg Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.
  • Bernice Koo Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.
  • Ruel Mendoza Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.
  • Thanh Ngo Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.
  • John S. Esterly Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.
  • Ahmd Azab Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.

Keywords:

academic entitlement, student consumerism, pharmacy education, student consumer, professionalism

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the attitudes regarding student consumerism and academic entitlement among pharmacy students and faculty and the association of student consumerism with professionalism in the classroom. Methods: The authors surveyed students and faculty at a college of pharmacy to measure attitudes for ‘student as the consumer’ and ‘student as the product’ of pharmacy education. The authors assessed the face validity, factor analysis, and Cronbach’s alpha value to examine the validity and reliability of their newly developed scales. Further, they used ordinal logistic regressions to analyse the association of student consumerism with professionalism in the classroom among pharmacy students. Results: The majority of student participants were female, had bachelor degrees, and were employed as pharmacy technicians or interns. The student survey scales exhibited high validity and reliability. Amongst pharmacy students, the authors found high levels of attitudes for students as both the consumers and the products of pharmacy education. However, most of the faculty believed that students are the products and not the consumers of pharmacy education. Further, the students who believed that they are the consumers of pharmacy education were more likely to be unprofessional in the classroom. Conclusion: Although students had high levels of attitude regarding student consumerism, they still believed that the goal of their education is professional competence. It is important to curb student consumerism to curtail unprofessional behaviour in the classroom. Education and support should be provided to the faculty in their efforts to check consumerism among pharmacy students.

Author Biographies

Melany Patricia Puglisi, Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.

Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy  

Rahul Garg, Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy

Bernice Koo, Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.

Pharmacist, College of Pharmacy  

Ruel Mendoza, Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.

Pharmacist, College of Pharmacy

Thanh Ngo, Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.

Pharmacist, College of Pharmacy

John S. Esterly, Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.

Associate Professor, College of Pharmacy  

Ahmd Azab, Chicago State University, Illinois, USA.

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmcy Practice, College of Pharmacy  

References

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education [ACPE]. (2015). Accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree (online). Available at: https:// www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf. Accessed 1st July, 2019

American College of Clinical Pharmacy. (2009). Tenets of professionalism for pharmacy students. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 29(6), 757-759. doi: 10.1592/phco. 29.6.757

Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S.E. (2017). The student- as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958-1978. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908

Cain, J., Campbell, T., Congdon, H.B., Hancock, K., Kaun, M., Lockman, P.R., & Evans, R.L. (2014). Pharmacy student debt and return on investment of a pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(1), 5. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7815

Cain, J., Noel, Z., Smith, K.M., & Romanelli, F. (2014). Four rights of the pharmacy educational consumer. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(6), 115. doi: 10.5688/ajpe786115

Cain, J., Romanelli, F., & Smith, K.M. (2012). Academic entitlement in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 189. doi: 10.5688/ ajpe7610189

Carini, R.M., Hayek, J.C., Kuh, G.D., Kennedy, J.M., & Ouimet, J.A. (2003). College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter? Research in Higher Education, 44(1), 1-19

Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9

Drost, E.A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105

Dubovsky, S.L. (1986). Coping with Entitlement in Medical Education. New England Journal of Medicine, 315(26), 1672-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198612253152609

Fjortoft, N. (2016). The challenge of the accreditation council for pharmacy education’s

standard four: Identifying, teaching, measuring. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(5), 73. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80573

Grabenstein, J.D. (2016). Trends in the numbers of US colleges of pharmacy and their graduates, 1900 to 2014. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), 25. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80225

Hall, J., & Ashcroft, D. (2011). What characterises professionalism in pharmacy students? A nominal group study. Pharmacy Education, 11(1), 65-70

Hammer, D.P., Berger, B.A., Beardsley, R.S., & Easton, M.R. (2003). Student professionalism. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3), 96

Holdford, D.A. (2014). Is a pharmacy student the customer or the product? American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(1), 3

Insititute, S. (2012). SAS 9.4 for windows. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Jeffres, M.N., Barclay, S.M., & Stolte, S.K. (2014). Academic entitlement and academic performance in graduating pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(6), 116. doi: 10.5688/ajpe786116

Knapp, H., & Kirk, S.A. (2003). Using pencil and paper, internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: Does methodology matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 117-134. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00008-0

Qualtrics, I. (2013). Qualtrics. com. Provo, UT, USA.

Saunders, D.B. (2015). They do not buy it: Exploring the extent to which entering first-year students view themselves as customers. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25(1), 5-28. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2014.969798

Sullivan, G.M., & Artino Jr, A.R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541-542. doi: 10.4300/ JGME-5-4-18

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Published

07/04/2020

Issue

Section

Research Article