RESEARCH ARTICLE: Online versus classroom learning in pharmacy education: Students' preference and readiness

Authors

  • Qi Ying Lean Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang & Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor
  • Long Chiau Ming Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong & University of Tasmania, Tasmania
  • Chin Fen Neoh Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor
  • Yuet Yen Wong Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Kampus Bertam, Pulau Pinang
  • Siti Nur Fadzilah Muhsain Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Kampus Bertam, Pulau Pinang
  • Maryam Farooqui Qassim University, Unaizah, Qassim

Keywords:

Classroom, e-Learning, Pedagogy, Teaching Methodology, Web-based

Abstract

Introduction: Online learning has been adopted in delivering many courses by tertiary education institutions due to several advantages it offers. Similarly, online learning has been promoted in pharmacy education to enhance student learning. This study explored pharmacy students’ performance and preferences towards online versus classroom learning.Methods: An online learning module was developed for an independent subject focused on basic patient counselling skills based on the course syllabus of Hospital Pharmacy. All second-year Diploma in Pharmacy students were stratified into online learning and face-to-face learning groups according to their cumulative grade point average (GPA) scores. The two groups were then invited to learn separately via online or face-to-face learning. After the activities, students’ knowledge on the subject was compared before they completed an online feedback survey.Results: There was no significant difference between the knowledge scores when comparing online learning and face- to-face learning, suggesting online learning was as effective as the face-to-face learning method. The majority of students reported that they enjoyed online learning and found that online learning was a useful learning tool. Having said that, most students purported a preference for a blended learning approach. The students valued the interaction available in face-to-face learning and the time flexibility offered by online learning.Conclusion: Online and face-to-face learning methods were found equally effective for student learning, yet pharmacy students denoted that they favoured a blended learning approach. Although computer and innovative technologies diversify existing teaching and learning methodologies, matching students’ learning needs is crucial when selecting the delivery approach to maximise student learning outcomes.

Author Biographies

Qi Ying Lean, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang & Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang & Vector-Borne Diseases Research Group (VERDI), Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences CoRe, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor

Long Chiau Ming, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong & University of Tasmania, Tasmania

PAP Rashidah Sa’adatul Bolkiah Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam & Unit for Medication Outcomes Research and Education (UMORE), Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania

Chin Fen Neoh, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor

Faculty of Pharmacy & Collaborative Drug Discovery Research (CDDR) Group, Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences Community of Research

Yuet Yen Wong, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Kampus Bertam, Pulau Pinang

Faculty of Pharmacy

Siti Nur Fadzilah Muhsain, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Pulau Pinang, Kampus Bertam, Pulau Pinang

Senior Lecturer - Faculty of Pharmacy

Maryam Farooqui, Qassim University, Unaizah, Qassim

Assistant Professor & Coordinator of Pharmacy Pracice - Unaizah College of Pharmacy

References

Annansingh, F. (2019). Mind the gap: Cognitive active learning in virtual learning environment perception of instructors and students. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3669-3688. doi: 10.1007/s10639- 019-09949-5

Bloomfield, J., Roberts, J., & While, A. (2010). The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: a randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(3), 287-294

Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2016). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1162-1175. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.964263

Campbell, C., & Blair, H. (2018). Learning the active way: Creating interactive lectures to promote student learning. In Handbook of research on pedagogical models for next-generation teaching and learning (ed K. Jared). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global, pp. 21-37

Clarke, C.L., Schott, K.A., & Arnold, A.D. (2018). Preceptor Perceptions of Virtual Quality Assurance Experiential Site Visits. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(4), 6438. doi: 10.5688/ ajpe6438

Curley, L.E., Wu, Z., & Svirskis, D. (2018). Using Technology in Pharmacy Education: Pharmacy Student Performance and Perspectives When Visual Aids Are Integrated Into Learning. Frontiers in pharmacology, 9(1062). doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01062

Dantas, A.M., & Kemm, R.E. (2008). A blended approach to active learning in a physiology laboratory- based subject facilitated by an e-learning component. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(1), 65-75. doi: 10.1152/advan.00006.2007

Dhaliwal, N., Simpson, F., & Kim-Sing, A. (2018). Self- paced online learning modules for pharmacy practice educators: Development and preliminary evaluation. Curr Pharm Teach Learn, 10(7), 964-974. doi: 10.1016/ j.cptl.2018.04.017

Duque, G., Demontiero, O., Whereat, S., Gunawardene, P., Leung, O., Webster, P., Sardinha, L., Boersma, D., & Sharma, A. (2013). Evaluation of a blended learning model in geriatric medicine: A successful learning experience for medical students. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 32(2), 103-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2012.00620.x

George, P.P., Papachristou, N., Belisario, J.M., Wang, W., Wark, P.A., Cotic, Z., et al. (2014). Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. Journal of Global Health, 4(1). doi: 10.7189/jogh.04.010406

Harman, B.A., & Sato, T. (2011). Cell phone use and grade point average among undergraduate university students. College Student Journal, 45(3), 544-549

Jatau, A.I., Ming, L.C., & Awaisu, A. (2018). Quality assurance, accreditation, and glocalisation of pharmacy programmes. Pharmacy Education, 18(1), 149-150

John, E.M., Neoh, C.F., Ming, L.C., Hong, Y.H., & Hassan, Y. (2016). Learning Style Preferences of Undergraduate Pharmacy Students in a Malaysian Public University. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 50(3), 330-334. doi: 10.5530/ijper.50.3.3

Kirschner, P.A., & Karpinski, A.C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in human behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024

Krauss, F., & Ally, M. (2005). A study of the design and evaluation of a learning object and implications for content development. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1(1), 1-22

Lean, Q.Y., Ming, L.C., Wong, Y.Y., Neoh, C.F., Farooqui, M., & Muhsain, S.N.F. (2018). Validation of online learning in pharmacy education: Effectiveness and student insight. Pharmacy Education, 18(1), 135-142

Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1-10. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

Mahlangu, V.P. (2018). The good, the bad, and the ugly of distance learning in higher education. Trends in E- learning, Mahmut Sinecen, IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/ intechopen.75702

Makhdoom, N., Khoshhal, K.I., Algaidi, S., Heissam, K., & Zolaly, M.A. (2013). ‘Blended learning’ as an effective teaching and learning strategy in clinical medicine: a comparative cross-sectional university-based study. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 8(1), 12-17

Maloy, R.W., Verock-O'Loughlin, R.-E., Edwards, S.A., & Woolf, B.P. (2014). Transforming learning with new technologies (2nd ed.), Pearson

Managing-Drug-Supply. (2012). Computers in pharmaceutical management. In Managing Access to Medicines and Health Technologies (3rd ed.), Management Sciences for Health. pp.50.51-50.24. Available at: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/ Js19627en/

Maxwell, W.D., Fabel, P.H., Diaz, V., Walkow, J.C., Kwiek, N.C., Kanchanaraksa, S., Wamsley, M., Chen, A., & Bookstaver, P.B. (2018). Massive open online courses in U.S. healthcare education: Practical considerations and lessons learned from implementation. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 10(6), 736-743. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.013

Ming, L.C., & Khan, T.M. (2018). Curricula Orientations: Classical- Versus Clinical-Oriented Curricula. In Pharmacy Education in the Twenty First Century and Beyond (eds. A.I. Fathelrahman, M.I. Mohamed Ibrahim, A.A. Alrasheedy & A.I. Wertheimer), Academic Press, pp.89-100

Mohamed Ibrahim, M.I. (2018). Philosophy, Theories, Models, and Strategies in Pharmacy Education: An Overview. In Pharmacy Education in the Twenty First Century and Beyond. (eds A.I. Fathelrahman, M.I. Mohamed Ibrahim, A.A. Alrasheedy & A.I. Wertheimer), Academic Press, pp.21-39

Park, H.L., & Shrewsbury, R.P. (2016). Student evaluation of online pharmaceutical compounding videos. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 80(2), 30. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80230

Porter, A.L., Pitterle, M.E., & Hayney, M.S. (2014). Comparison of online versus classroom delivery of an immunization elective course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(5), 96. doi: 10.5688/ ajpe78596

Revere, L., & Kovach, J.V. (2011). Online technologies for engaged learning. A meaningful synthesis for educators. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 113-124

Rowe, M., Frantz, J., & Bozalek, V. (2012). The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review. Medical Teacher, 34(4), e216-e221.

Salter, S.M., Karia, A., Sanfilippo, F.M., & Clifford, R.M. (2014). Effectiveness of e-learning in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(4), 83. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78483

Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2019). The relation between students’ socioeconomic status and ICT literacy: Findings from a meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 138(1), 13-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2019.04.011

Vo, H.M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N.A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17-28. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002

Waite, L.H., Scaletta, A.L., & Hadley, D.E. (2018). Innovative Approaches to Teaching Dyslipidemia Management in a Required Pharmacy Therapeutics Sequence. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(7), 6317. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6317

Warnecke, E., & Pearson, S. (2011). Medical students' perceptions of using e-learning to enhance the acquisition of consulting skills. The Australasian Medical Journal, 4(6), 300-307. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.736

Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z., & Zhou, N. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. Information & Management, 42(4), 575-589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.03.001

Published

31/01/2020

Issue

Section

Research Article