Promotion and tenure: Clinical faculty at schools of pharmacy in Canada

Authors

  • Zubin Austin Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 19 Russell Street, Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S 1A1
  • Paul A. M. Gregory Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 19 Russell Street, Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S 1A1

Keywords:

Pharmacy education, clinical pharmacy, clinical faculty, tenure and promotion

Abstract

As a result of an evolution in roles and responsibilities of pharmacists, pharmacy education in North America has become more clinical in nature. In order to meet teaching and research requirements, Canadian pharmacy schools are hiring non-traditional faculty members who possess advanced clinical degrees and training rather than traditional academic qualifications. Policies with respect to tenure and promotion have not kept pace with these changes in hiring practices. Research was undertaken to examine the application of tenure and promotion policies and guidelines to clinical pharmacy faculty members across Canada. Document review was complemented by key informant interviews. A series of themes emerged indicating areas of concern regarding application of traditional “arts and science” tenuring/promotion policies for clinical pharmacy faculty members. Based on these themes, a model for development of guidelines to acknowledge the value and importance of creative scholarly activity within pharmacy (“the 5 C’s”) is proposed and discussed.

References

Anderson, R. J., D’Souza, M., Grapes, Z. T., Kavula, M., & Miller, S. W. (1998). Promotion and tenure—do criteria and process differ? American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 62(3), 354.

Bajcar, J., Endreyni, L., Paton, T., Pugsley, J., Stieb, E., Uetrecht, J., & Winslade, N. (1994). Guidelines for creative professional activity, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Canada.

Barnett, C. W., & Matthews, H. W. (1998). Current procedures used to evaluate teaching in schools of pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 62(4), 388–391.

Harm, L. S. (1983). Another perspective on promotion, tenure, and retention. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 47(4), 353 – 356.

Holstad, S., Burke, J., Prosser, T., Dobesh, P., & Lakamp, R. (2000). Clinical faculty promotion and tenure guidelines: Models for faculty development, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2000; 101 (Jul); 40.

Orlando, P., Gunning, K., Shane-McWhorter, L., Oderda, G., Rusho, W., & Rollins, D. (2000). Retention and promotion of clinical faculty: Examination of US pharmacy school guidelines, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2000; 101 (Jul); 80.

Popovich, N. G., & Abel, S. R. (2002). The need for a broadened definition of faculty scholarship and creativity. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 66(1), 59–65.

Ritchie, D., Burke, J., Dahdal, W., Holstad, S., & Maddux, M. (1999). Clinical faculty mentoring, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting 1999; 100 (Jul); 30.

Wolfgang, A. P., Gupchup, G. V., & Plake, K. S. (1995). Relative importance of performance criteria in promotion and tenure decisions: Perceptions of pharmacy faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 59(4), 342–347.

Published

13/07/2006

Issue

Section

Research Article