article/article.tpl

An investigation of pharmacy student perception of competence-based learning using the individual Skills Evaluation and Development program, iSED®

Susan J Allen, Jon Waterfield, Peter Rivers

Abstract

Background: The Objective Structured Clinical Exercise (OSCE) is the mainstay of clinical competence evaluation of healthcare professionals. The iSED® (individualised Skills Evaluation and Development) program, developed by Leicester School of Pharmacy, embraces various learning theories and was conceived to enhance the OSCE experience and facilitate students’ self-regulation in developing clinical competence.

Aim: To explore pharmacy students’ experience of using iSED® to develop clinical competence.

Method: Data were collected using a mixed methods study comprising an attitudinal Likert-style questionnaire, completed by second year MPharm students at Leicester School of Pharmacy, and focus groups with second year and third year students.

Results: Students expressed a positive perception towards iSED®, characterised by three emergent themes: ‘Visualisation and nature of feedback’, ‘Self-regulation and cyclical learning’, ‘Seeing yourself as others see you’.

Conclusion: Experience of iSED® supports clinical skills development through objective self-observation against a gold standard and facilitates understanding of individual learner identity. 


Keywords

Competence, iSED®, Skills, OSCE, Self-Regulation, Feedback


Full Text:

PDF

References

Austin, Z., O’byrne, C., Pugsley, J., Quero Munoz, L. (2003). Development and validation processes for an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for entry-to-practice certification in pharmacy: the Canadian experience. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3): Article 76.

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32 (3), pp. 347-364.

Bosse, H.M., Nickel, M., Huwendiek, S., Junger, J., Schultz, J.H. & Nikendei, C. (2010). Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect. BMC Medical Education, 10(27).

Coles, C. (2002). Developing professional judgment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 22(1), 3-10.

Epstein, R.M. & Hundert, E.M. (2002). Defining and assessing professional competence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(2), 226-235.

Figueira, A. & Rocha, J.B. (2014). A proposal for teaching undergraduate chemistry students carbohydrate biochemistry by problem-based learning activities. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(1), 81-87.

Gigante, J., Dell, M. & Sharkey, A. (2011). Getting beyond “Good job”: how to give effective feedback. Paediatrics, 127(2), 205-207.

General Pharmaceutical Council [GPhC] (2011). Plan and Record p5 (online). Available at: http:// www.pharmacyregulation.org/sites/ default/files/GPhC %20Plan%20and%20Record%20g.pdf. Accessed 18th March, 2016.

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

Kolb D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Prentice Hall

Lipnevich, A.A. & Smith, J.K. (2009). “I really need feedback to learn:” students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(4), 347-367.

Malau-Aduli, B.S., Mulcahy, S., Warnecke, E., Otahal, P., Teague, P-A., Turner, R. & Van Der Vleuten, C. (2012). Inter-Rater Reliability: Comparison of Checklist and Global Scoring for OSCEs. Creative Education, 3 (Special Issue), 937-942.

Miller, G.E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/ competence/performance. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 65(9 Suppl), S63.

Nicol, D.J. & Macfarlane-Dick D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.

Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self- regulated learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation (eds. M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner), San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 451-502.

Pintrich, P.R. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 395-407.

Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.

Stroud, L., Herold, J., Tomlinson, G. & Cavalcanti, R.B. (2011). Who you know or what you know? Effect of examiner familiarity with residents on OSCE scores. Academic Medicine, 86(10), S8–S11.

Wass, V., Van Der Vleuten, C., Shatzer, J. & Jones, R. (2001). Assessment of clinical competence. The Lancet, 357, 945–49.

Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394.

Wheatley, W.J. (1995). How Real Should Experiential Pedagogy Be? A Viewpoint from our Students. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 22.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
article/comments.tpl article/footer.tpl