Early indicators of success in a pharmacy curriculum: The role ofpre-professional science and mathematics courses


  • Robert T Crow St. Louis College of Pharmacy, 4588 Parkview Place, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
  • Claude J Gaebelein St. Louis College of Pharmacy, 4588 Parkview Place, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
  • Mona Patel St. Louis College of Pharmacy, 4588 Parkview Place, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA


ssessment, academic performance, pre-pharmacy students, pharmacy students, grade point average, statisticalsignificance


This study identified courses in the pre-professional portion of the curriculum at the St. Louis College of Pharmacy that predicted success in the professional pharmacy curriculum, as measured by their impact on both cumulative grade pointaverage (GPA) for their pre-professional work as well as their GPA before entering clinical externships. Transcripts of the class that started their pre-professional coursework in 1997 at the St. Louis College of Pharmacy underwent multiple regression modeling using SPSS software to analyze the effect of pre-professional science and math courses on pre-professional and pre-clinical academicperformance. The basic math and science skills taught in general chemistry, biology, physiology, physics and organic chemistry had the strongest correlation with pre-professional success. Successful entry into the externship phase of the pharmacy curriculum depended primarily on biology, organic chemistry and physiology. 


Allen, D. D., & Bond, C. A. (2001). Pre-pharmacy predictors of success in pharmacy school: Grade point averages, Pharmacy College Admissions Test, communication abilities, and critical thinking skills.Pharmacotherapy,21, 842– 849.

American Council on Pharmaceutical Education. Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree, Chicago,IL (1997)

Carroll, C. A., & Garavalia, L. S. (2004). article 88 Factors contributing to the academic achievement of pharmacy students: Use of the goal-efficacy framework.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,68.

Chisolm, M. A., Cobb, H. H., & Kotzan, J. A. (1995). Significant factors predicting academic success of first-year pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,59,364 –370.

Cox, F. M., & Teat, D. W. (1991). Predictors of academic performance in a Doctor of Pharmacy training program.Journal of Pharmacy Teaching,2, 45–58.

Friedman, C. B., Lage, G., Norwood, G. J., & Stewart, J. (1987). Predictive validity of the Pharmacy College Admission Test.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,51, 288– 291.

Hardigan, P. C., Lai, L., Arneson, D., & Robeson, A. (2001).Significance of academic merit, test scores, interviews, andthe admissions process: A case study.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,65, 40–44.

Jacoby, K. E., Plaxco, W. B., Kjerluff, K., & Weinert, A. B. (1978).The use of demographic and background variables as predictors of success in pharmacy school. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,42,4–7.

Kidd, R. S., & Latif, D. A. (2003). article 109 Traditional and novel predictors of classroom and clerkship success of pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,67.

Kotzan, J. A., & Entrekin, D. N. (1977). Validity comparison of PCAT and SAT in the prediction of first year GPA. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,41, 12–17.

Sansgiry, S. S., Kawatkar, A. A., Dutta, A. P., & Bhosle, M. J.(2004). article 103 Predictors of academic performance at two universities: The effects of academic progression. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,68.

Thomas, M. C., & Draugalis, J. R. (2002). Utility of the PharmacyCollege Admissions Test (PCAT): Implications for admissionscommittees.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,66,47–51.



Research Article