Pharmacy students’ views and experiences of Turnitinw—an online tool for detecting academic dishonest

Authors

  • Janie Sheridan Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Pharmacy Council of New Zealand. School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland,Auckland, New Zealand
  • Raid Alany Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, FNZCP School of PharmacyThe University of Auckland,Auckland, New Zealand
  • Dulcie-Jane Brake Faculty Education Unit, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland,Auckland, New Zealand.

Keywords:

Academic dishonesty, attitudes, cheating, detection, plagiarism, Turnitin

Abstract

Introduction: Detecting and preventing academic dishonesty (cheating and plagiarism) is an issue for scholars. The aim of this study was to explore pharmacy students’ views on the use of Turnitin, an online plagiarism detection tool. Methods: All students in Years 3 and 4 of the BPharm course at the School of Pharmacy, the University of Auckland, were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire looking at a number of issues including their views on using Turnitin and the penalties for those caught. Results: A 64% response rate was obtained. The majority indicated that the use of Turnitin had helped them to reference correctly and write assignments in their own words, but only a minority had gained a more clear understanding of thedefinition of plagiarism. Discussion:Students indicated wanting more feedback from tutors on the outcomes of submitting their work to Turnitin. Feedback from this study will be used to support the way in which Turnitin is used at the School. Further research is needed into the potential impact on learning outcomes

References

Aggarwal, R., Bates, I., Davies, J. G., & Khan, I. (2002). A study of academic dishonesty among students at two pharmacy schools. Pharmaceutical Journal,269, 529 –533.

Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in higher education, 22,187– 203

Burnett, S. (2002). Dishonor and distrust.Community College Week,14,6–8.

Howard, R. M. (2002). Don’t Police Plagiarism: Just TEACH! Education Digest,67, 46–49.

Laird, E. (2001). We all pay for Internet plagiarism. Education Digest,67, 55–60.

Meade, J. (1992). Cheating: Is academic dishonesty par for the course?Prism,1, 30–32.

Ng, H. W., Davies, G., Bates, I., & Avellone, M. (2003). Academic dishonesty among pharmacy students—Investigating academic dishonesty behaviours in undergraduates.Pharmacy Education,3, 261 –269.

Park, C. (2003). In Other (People’s) Words: Plagiarism by university students –literature and lessons.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,28, 471–488.

Rennie, S. C., & Rudland, J. R. (2003). Differences in medical students’ attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behaviour across the years—a questionnaire study. Journal of Medical Ethics,29, 97–102.

Scanlon, P., & Neumann, R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students.Journal of College Student Development,43,374 –385.

Turnitin.com. (2005).Turntin homepage. http://www.turnitin.com/static/home.html

Underwood, J., & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic offences and

e-learning: Individual propensities in cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology,34, 467–477.

White, E. M. (1993). Too many campuses want to sweep student plagiarism under the rug. Chronicle of Higher Education,39, A44

Downloads

How to Cite

Sheridan, J., Alany, R., & Brake, D.-J. (2018). Pharmacy students’ views and experiences of Turnitinw—an online tool for detecting academic dishonest. Pharmacy Education, 5(3). Retrieved from https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/179

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2005)

Section

Research Article

License

It is a condition of the publication that authors vest or license copyright in their articles, including abstracts, in FIP. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and the journal, to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Authors may, of course, use the material elsewhere after publication providing that prior permission is obtained from FIP. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.