Using “thinking hat” debates to address controversial topics and enhance critical thinking in the pharmacy programme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2023.231.780795Keywords:
Debate, DEIA, Online, Pharmacogenomics, Thinking hat, VaccineAbstract
Background: This study shares advantages and lessons learned on the design and incorporation of the “thinking hat” in debates in the pharmacy curriculum, which was used to address controversial topics, including Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Anti-racism (DEIA).
Methods: The “thinking hat” was administered in three independent Doctor of Pharmacy degree (PharmD) programmes to five student cohorts. The debate topics were: “COVID-19 vaccination mandates” and “genetic sequencing in healthcare.” The structure and assessment were similar. At the completion, students completed a perception survey and reflected on their experience.
Results: The “thinking hat” can be implemented in pharmacy schools to increase critical thinking, and integrate awareness of topics, like DEIA. The “thinking hat” is easily reproducible and versatile for each institution’s needs, making it a useful tool to share. Common themes from student feedback included enhanced class engagement, applicability of concepts discussed in the classroom, better preparation for facing challenging opinions in practice, and awareness of diversity and inclusion.
Conclusions: The “thinking-hat” activity was conducted in multiple locations, with different delivery methods, and with larger cohorts than previous debates in the literature. The “thinking hat” approach applies across various settings and can be used to introduce timely and controversial topics.
References
Ang, R. X., Chew, Q. H., Sum, M. Y., Sengupta, S., & Sim, K. (2019). Systematic review of the use of debates in health professions education–Does it work? GMS Journal of Medical Education, 36(4), 37. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001245
Bond, R., Bastianelli, K. M. S., Gunaseelan S., Chamberlin, K. W., & Shealy, K. M. (2022). How debate could facilitate group function in pharmacy schools. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Oct 11, 8864. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8864
Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(11), 769‒771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3
DeBono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats: An essential approach to business management. Little, Brown, and Company.
Gálvez-Peralta, M., Szklarz, G. D., Geldenhuys, W. J., & Lockman, P. R. (2018). An effective approach to teaching pharmacogenomics in the first year of pharmacy curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(8), 6345. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6345
Goebel, G., & Seabert, D. (2006). Put on your thinking hats. Journal of School Health, 76(7), 393‒395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00131.x
Darby, M. (2007). Debate: A teaching-learning strategy for developing competence in communication and critical thinking. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 81, 78.
Dy-Boarman, E. A., Nisly, S. A., & Costello, T. J. (2018). It is no debate, debates are great. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 10‒13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.09.016
Green, C. S., & Klug, H. G. (1990). Teaching critical thinking and writing through debates: An experimental evaluation. Teaching Sociology, 18, 462. https://doi.org/10.2307/1317631
Hamilton, L. A., Suda, K. J., Heidel, R. E., McDonough, S. L. K., Hunt, M. E., & Franks, A. S. (2020). The role of online learning in pharmacy education: A nationwide survey of student pharmacists. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 12(6), 614‒625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.026
Hanna, L. -A., Barry, J., Donnelly, R., Hughes, F., Jones, D., Laverty, G., Parsons, C., & Ryan, C. (2014). Using debate to teach pharmacy students about ethical issues. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(3), 57. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78357
Hawkins, W. A., Fulford, M., & Phan, S. V. (2019). Using debates as the primary pedagogy to teach critical care in a PharmD curriculum elective course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(9), 943‒948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.05.010
Jugdev, K., Markowski, C., & Mengel, T. (2004). Using the debate as a teaching tool in the online classroom. Online Classroom, 1(10), 4–6. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/44259/2004%20online%20classroom%20PM%20debate.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Lampkin, S. J., Collins, C., Danison, R., & Lewis, M. (2015). Active learning through a debate series in a first-year pharmacy self-care course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79225
Lieberman, S. A., Trumble, J. M., & Smith, E. R. (2000). The impact of structured student debates on critical thinking and informatics skills of second-year medical students. Academic Medicine, 75(10 Suppl), S84–S86. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200010001-00027
Lin, S. J., & Crawford, S. Y. (2007). An online debate series for first-year pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71, 12. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj710112
Mamtani, M., Scott, K. R., DeRoos, F. J., & Conlon, L. W. (2015). Assessing EM patient safety and quality improvement milestones using a novel debate format. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 16(6), 943–946. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27269
Medina, M. S., Plaza, C. M., Stowe, C. D., Robinson, E. T., DeLander, G., Beck, D. E., Melchert R. B., Supernaw R. B., Roche V. F., Gleason B. L., Strong M. N., Bain A., Meyer G. E., Dong B. J., Rochon J., & Johnston P. (2013). Centre for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(8), 162. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe778162
Nutter, S. C., & Gálvez-Peralta, M. (2018). Pharmacogenomics: From classroom to practice. Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine, 6(3), 307‒313. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.417
Ong, C. C., & Narasimhan, K. L. (2010). A novel learning experience: case-based, evidence-based debate. Medical Education, 44(5), 515–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03644.x.
Prasad, S. J., Nair, P., Gadhvi, K., Barai, I., Danish H. S., & Philip A. B. (2016). Cultural humility: Treating the patient, not the illness. Medical Education Online, 21(1), 30908. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.30908
Randolph, D. S. (2007). Student perceptions of the use of debate as a teaching strategy in the allied health professions. Journal of Allied Health, 36(1), e13–e29.
Rizzolo, D., Sandifer, C., Kalabalik-Hoganson, J., & Lowy, N. (2022). A call to action for cultural humility in pharmacy education student assessments. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(4), 8626. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8626
Salter, S. M., Sanfilippo, F. M., & Clifford, R. M. (2014). Effectiveness of e-learning in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(4), 83. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78483
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple Smith.
Steuber, T., Isaacs, A. N., Howard, M. L., & Nisly, S. A. (2022). Effectiveness of journal club activities vs clinical debate activities in pharmacy experiential education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(1), 8562. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8562
Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117‒125. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2010.0233
Viswesh, V., Yang, H., & Gupta, V. (2018). Evaluation of a modified debate exercise adapted to the pedagogy of team-based learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(4), 6278. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6278
