Learning with other health professions in the United Kingdom MPharm degree: multidisciplinary and placement education.
Keywords:
MPharm, Multidisciplinary Learning, Pharmacy Education, Placement Education, Teaching, UndergraduateAbstract
This paper reviews the approach to multidisciplinary and placement education in UK schools of pharmacy. The methodology involved triangulation of course documentation, staff interviews and a final year student survey. Staff members were supportive of multidisciplinary learning. The advantages were development of a wider appreciation of the students‟ future professional role and better understanding of the roles of other professional groups. The barriers were logistics (student numbers; multiple sites; different timetables), the achievement of balanced numbers between disciplines and engagement of students from all participating disciplines. Placement education was offered by all schools, predominantly in hospital settings. Key problems were funding and the lack of staff resources. Currently, multidisciplinary learning within the UK for pharmacy students is inadequate and is coupled with relatively low levels of placement education. In order for things to change, there should be a review of funding and support from government and the private sector employers.References
All Party Pharmacy Group (2007) The Future of Pharmacy, A Report of the APPG Inquiry. London.
Barr, H., Freeth, D., Hammick, M., Koppel, I. & Reeves, S. (2006) The evidence base and recommendations for interprofessional education in health and social care. Journal of Interprofessional Care,20,75-78.
Curan, V. R., Deacon, D. R. & Fleet, L. (2005) Academic administrators' attitudes towards interprofessional education in Canadian schools of health professional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care,Supplement 1,76-86.
Department of Health (2001) Placements in Focus. London, Department of Health.
Derrett, C. & Underwood, M. (2002) A Multi-professional Taught Cause in Primary Care Therapeutics: Description and Evaluation. Pharmacy Education,1,115-123.
Edmunds, J. & Calnan, M. (2001) The reprofessionalisation of community pharmacy? An exploration of attitudes to extended roles for community pharmacy amongst pharmacists and general practitioners in the United Kingdom. Social Science & Medicine,53,943-955.
General Medical Council (2001) Good Medical Practice. London, GMC.
Gibson, T. M. & Diack, H. L. (2006) Views and attitudes of undergraduates pharmacy and medical students towards interprofessional learning. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice,Supplement 2,B35-B36.
Hassell, K., Seston, L. & Eden, M. (2006) Pharmacy Workforce Census 2005: Main findings. London, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.
Kairuz, T. & Shaw, J. (2005) Undergraduate inter-professional learning involving pharmacy, nursing and medical students: The Maori health week initiative. Pharmacy Education,5,255-259.
Otter, S., Robinson, C., James, D., Allen, M., Davies, J. & Stew, G. (2003) An Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Joint Clinical Placement between Podiatry and Pharmacy Students. Pharmacy Education,3,253-260.
Plaza, C. M. & Draugakis, J. R. (2000) Implications of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Placements. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,64,404-409.
Remington, T. L., Foulk, M. A. & Williams, B. C. (2006) Evaluation of Evidence for Interprofessional Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,70,66.
Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (2002) Accreditation of UK Pharmacy Degree Courses. London, RPSGB.
Wilson, K., Jesson, J., Langley, C., Clarke, L. & Hatfield, K. (2005) Mpharm Programmes: Where are we now? Report commissioned by the Pharmacy Practice Research Trust.
Yanchick, V. A. (2004) Multidisciplinary education: a challenge for pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,63,77.
