A comparative analysis of the ACPE accreditation standards and the FIP developmental goals and impact on pharmacy education

Authors

  • Suleiman Sharif Clinical Pharmacy Programme, School of Health & Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya
  • Riad M. Abdelrahman Clinical Pharmacy Programme, School of Health & Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya
  • Taha H. Musa Clinical Pharmacy Program, School of Health & Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya
  • Ismail A. Arbab Clinical Pharmacy Program, School of Health & Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya
  • Mohsen Hussein Suliman Clinical Pharmacy Program, School of Health & Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya
  • Khalid A. Mohamad Clinical Pharmacy Program, School of Health & Medical Sciences, Libyan International University, Benghazi, Libya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2025.251.353358

Keywords:

ACPE, FIP developmental goal, Pharmacy education

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the 2025 Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) standards and the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) developmental goals. Tracking similarities and differences between international pharmacy organisations may encourage collaboration and symmetry in advancing pharmacy education.

Methods: The review occurred in three phases. Five authors individually examined the ACPE standards and FIP DGs, aiming for consensus on the comparison of ACPE subdomains with FIP elements. In the second phase, the same reviewers evaluated each other's mappings as a group. Finally, two reviewers confirmed the validity of the mapping results.

Results: The mapping showed similarities between the two frameworks, with varying matches. The proportion of ACPE subdomains aligned with FIP DG elements ranged from 5% to 33%. The “Curriculum” standard aligned most significantly with FIP goals, covering DGs 1, 5, 7, 8, 15, 17, and 19, which accounted for 33%. “Experiential learning” matched FIP goals 1, 2, 4, 9, 14, and 18, totalling 29%, while “Assessment” fully aligned with the FIP goals.

Conclusion: This review's findings could prompt accrediting bodies and pharmacy educators to unify standards and goals, fostering knowledge exchange and innovation. This collaboration would support the sustainable development of the pharmacy profession and address changing patient needs.

References

ACPE. (2024). Setting the Standard in Pharmacy Education. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/

Aqqad, F., Meilianti, S., John, C., Koudmani, D., Akel, M., & Bates, I. (2024). Needs assessment of global pharmaceutical development goals: an explanatory mixed-methods study of 21 countries. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 32(1), 29–38, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riad078

Al-Ghananeem, A. M., Malcom, D. R., Shammas, S., & Aburjai, T. A. (2019). Response to letter on a call to action to transform pharmacy education and practice in the Arab World. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(6), 7731. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7731

Almusallam, A. (2013). Accreditation and quality assurance in post secondary education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2013(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2013.076

Anderson, C., Bates, I., Beck, D., Brock, T.P., Futter, B., Mercer, H., Rouse, M., Whitmarsh, S., Wuliji, T., & Yonemura, A. (2009). The WHO UNESCO FIP pharmacy education taskforce. Human Resources for Health, 7, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-45

Babar, Z. U. D. (2021). Ten recommendations to improve pharmacy practice in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-020-00288-2

Bheekie, A., Van Huyssteen, M., & Coetzee, R. (2019). Exploring the implications of a needs-based pharmacy education framework modelled on population health: Perspective from a developing country. Pharmacy, 7(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy7030116

FIP. (2021). FIP Global Competency Framework (GbCFv2) handbook: Supporting early career training strategy. The Hague: International Pharmaceutical Federation. https://www.fip.org/file/5546

FIP. (2022a). FIP report on engagement with our membership 2021. The Hague: International Pharmaceutical Federation. https://www.fip.org/file/5157

FIP. (2022b). The FIP global roadmap 2030: Sustainable advancement for pharmacy worldwide. Retrieved February 18, 2025, from https://developmentgoals.fip.org/globalroadmap2030

FIP. (2024). The global advanced development framework. International Pharmaceutical Federation. https://www.fip.org/gadf

Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., & Pate, M. (2018). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. The Lancet. Global Health, 6(11), e1196–e1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30386-3

Law, M., Seo, S.-W., Kahaleh, A. A., Gleason, S. E., & Tofade, T. (2020). Evaluation of the crosswalk between the ACPE Standards and the FIP Nanjing Statements. Pharmacy Education, 20(1), 52–55. https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/849/827

Sacre, H., Akel, M., Zeenny, R., Hajj, A., Hallit, S., & Salameh, P. (2021). Pharmacy education, workforce, practice, and sciences in Lebanon: Benchmarking with the FIP Development Goals. Pharmacy Education, 21, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2021.211.105120

Downloads

Published

25-05-2025

How to Cite

Sharif, S., Abdelrahman, R. M., Musa, T. H., Arbab, I. A., Suliman, M. H., & Mohamad, K. A. (2025). A comparative analysis of the ACPE accreditation standards and the FIP developmental goals and impact on pharmacy education. Pharmacy Education, 25(1), p. 353–358. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2025.251.353358

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Review

License

It is a condition of the publication that authors vest or license copyright in their articles, including abstracts, in FIP. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and the journal, to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Authors may, of course, use the material elsewhere after publication providing that prior permission is obtained from FIP. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.