Evaluation of differences in postgraduate year one pharmacy residency application rubrics

Authors

  • Rebecca Bruning Moffitt Cancer Centre, Tampa, Florida, United States
  • Allison Butts UK HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
  • Craig Martin College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, UK HealthCare, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
  • Sharya Bourdet Office of Academic Affiliations (14AA), Veterans Health Administration
  • Margaret Curtin Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, Maryland, United States
  • Shannon Giddens Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • James Kalus Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Frank Paloucek Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Willowbrook, Illinois, United States
  • Cathy Walker Johns Hopkins Department of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Becky Waltman Piedmont Athens Regional Department of Pharmacy, Athens, Georgia, United States
  • Aaron Cook College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, UK HealthCare, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2026.261.127136

Keywords:

Application, Candidate, Postgraduate training, Residency, Rubric

Abstract

Background: The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists standards require pharmacy residency programmes to systematically evaluate candidates. This study aimed to assess differences among eight PGY1 pharmacy residency application rubrics used to select candidates for interviews.

Methods: In December 2018, fifty applicants to the University of Kentucky HealthCare’s PGY1 Pharmacy Residency Programme were evaluated using eight different rubrics. A subgroup of sixteen applicants had their scores assessed by multiple scorers to analyse inter-rater variability. The main goal was to examine score variability across all applicants. Scores were normalised to a common scale, and statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and ANOVA tests.

Results: The evaluation of a candidate pool (n = 520) using eight unique rubrics yielded an overall mean score of 66.98 out of 100, with significant score differences across rubrics (p < 0.001). Inter-rater variability was low, with a maximum difference of six percent in scores. All rubrics assessed work experience, leadership positions, and publications, but not all included letters of recommendation. Letters of recommendation, work experience, and rotation experiences received the highest weight in the rubrics.

Conclusion: There was notable variability in scores among eight different PGY1 pharmacy residency application rubrics. While aspects like rotation experiences were highly ranked, others, such as letters of recommendation, varied significantly. Programmes prioritise different elements based on their preferences, leading to differences in applicant evaluations. This allows programmes to find candidates that fit their practice, but applicants should be aware that their portfolios may be assessed differently across programmes.

References

ASHP. (2023). ASHP accreditation standards for postgraduate pharmacy residency programs. Retrieved September 7 from https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/professional-development/residencies/docs/examples/ASHP-Accreditation-Standard-for-Postgraduate-Residency-Programs-effective-July-2023.pdf

Atyia, S. A., Paloucek, F. P., Butts, A. R., Oyler, D. R., Martin, C. A., Schadler, A. D., & Cook, A. M. (2020). Impact of PhORCAS references on overall application score for postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency candidates. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 77(15), 1237‒1242. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaa152

Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2004). Statistics review 9: One-way analysis of variance. Critical Care (London, England), 8(2), 130‒136. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2836

Blake, E. W., Friesner, D., Gettig, J. P., Hajjar, E., Gentry, E. J., & Kline, J. M. (2015). Comparing pharmacy practice faculty perceptions of first-year post-graduate residency (PGY1) selection criteria to those reported by PGY1 residency directors. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7, 20‒28.

Cho, J. C. (2018). Selecting candidates for pharmacy residencies: A national survey of residency programme directors. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 43(6), 844‒848. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12723

Crane, J. T., & Ferraro, C. M. (2000). Selection criteria for emergency medicine residency applicants. Academic Emergency Medicine, 7(1), 54‒60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01892.x

Cullen, M. W., Reed, D. A., Halvorsen, A. J., Wittich, C. M., Kreuziger, L. M., Keddis, M. T., McDonald, F. S., & Beckman, T. J. (2011). Selection criteria for internal medicine residency applicants and professionalism ratings during internship. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 86(3), 197‒202. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0655

DeLisa, J. A., Jain, S. S., & Campagnolo, D. I. (1994). Factors used by physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training directors to select their residents. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 73(3), 152‒156. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199406000-00002

Ensor, C. R., Walker, C. L., Rider, S. K., Clemente, E. U., Ashby, D. M., & Shermock, K. M. (2013). Streamlining the process for initial review of pharmacy residency applications: an analytic approach. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 70(19), 1670‒1675. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp120769

Gohlke, A. L., Ray, D. B., El-Ibiary, S. Y., & Barletta, J. F. (2014). Characteristics of the ideal postgraduate year 1 pharmacy practice residency candidate: A survey of residency programme directors. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 27(1), 84‒88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190013504962

Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377‒381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

Hillebrand, K., Leinum, C. J., Desai, S., Pettit, N. N., & Fuller, P. D. (2015). Residency application screening tools: A survey of academic medical centers. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 72(11 Suppl 1), S16‒19. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp150093

Hu, D., Veenhouwer, D., McCoy, J., & Caselnova, D. A., 3rd. (2019). A screening tool to identify qualified pharmacy residency candidates. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(4), 6714. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6714

Jellinek-Cohen, S. P., Cohen, V., Bucher, K. L., & Likourezos, A. (2012). Factors used by pharmacy residency programmes to select residents. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 69(13), 1105‒1106, 1108. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp100615

Macias-Moriarity, L. Z., Fetterman, J. W., Thomas, M. C., & Stajich, G. V. (2015). Residency programme director’s perception of PGY-1 applicants: Results of the National 35½ Second Survey. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(4), 465‒469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.04.009

National Matching Services, I. (2024, March 2024). ASHP match statistics. Retrieved March 26 from https://natmatch.com/ashprmp/stats.html

Pate, A. N., Mills, A. R., Fleming, J. W., Phan, H. K., Street, M., & Pitcock, J. J. (2023). Residency application content and considerations based on residency director review of a fictitious CV: What really matters? American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 80(17), 1147‒1156. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxad068

Poirier, M. P., & Pruitt, C. W. (2003). Factors used by pediatric emergency medicine programme directors to select their fellows. Pediatric Emergency Care, 19(3), 157‒161. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pec.0000081236.98249.ed

Reed, B. N. (2021). Rethinking letters of reference: Narrowing the gap between evidence and practice. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 78(23), 2175‒2179. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab243

Reed, B. N., Noel, Z. R., Heil, E. L., Shipper, A. G., & Gardner, A. K. (2021). Surveying the selection landscape: A systematic review of processes for selecting postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residents and key implications. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 4(2), 245‒256. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1334

Skrupky, L. P., Dy-Boarman, E. A., Gurgle, H. E., Isaacs, A. N., McCreary, E. K., Nisly, S. A., Paloucek, F., Peterson, D. M., Smith, A., Schramm, G. E., Education, T., Practice, T., & Network, R. (2021). Letters of reference for PGY1 pharmacy residency candidates: A survey of residency programme directors and opinion statement. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 4(3), 379‒389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1370

Warfield, M. N., Nei, S. D., Cole, K. C., & Krauter, A. K. (2024). Assessment of postgraduate Year 1 residency programme director preferences and priorities in evaluation of pharmacy residency candidates. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 88(12), 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101323

Downloads

Published

26-02-2026

How to Cite

Bruning, R., Butts, A., Martin, C., Bourdet, S., Curtin, M., Giddens, S., Kalus, J., Paloucek, F., Walker, C., Waltman, B., & Cook, A. (2026). Evaluation of differences in postgraduate year one pharmacy residency application rubrics. Pharmacy Education, 26(1), p. 127–136. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2026.261.127136

Issue

Section

Research Article