Exploring the educational value of a continuous glucose monitoring wear experience in pharmacy students: A qualitative study

Authors

  • Annarose Sorvillo School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, New Jersey, United States
  • Alyssa Ford RWJBarnabas Health, New Jersey, United States https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1495-1964
  • Maria Leibfried Pfizer, Inc., New York, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2026.261.152160

Keywords:

Active learning, Continuous glucose monitoring, CGM, Diabetes mellitus, Empathy, Pharmacy education, United States

Abstract

Background: Despite continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) being the standard of treatment for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, patient uptake has been reported to under 50%. Clinician awareness and identification of barriers can help reduce diabetes-related complications; however, less than half of pharmacy schools provide CGM education. The objective is to explore pharmacy students’ perceptions of a CGM wear experience and their self-reported awareness of patient challenges, device usability, and empathy-related considerations.

Methods: A CGM student-wear experience was incorporated into two sessions of an elective advanced pharmacotherapy course for third-year pharmacy students. The experience was divided into three parts over two class sessions, including a one-week CGM student-wear experience. Reflections were collected through an anonymous questionnaire and a recorded focus group. A thematic approach guided analysis, and reviewers reached consensus on themes.

Results: Seventeen students participated; 70.6% had prior experience with traditional finger-stick blood glucose monitoring, while only one had CGM experience. Students described four areas of awareness: empathy for patient experiences, recognition of CGM as a self-management tool, perceived value of hands-on learning, and anticipated barriers.

Conclusion: Students perceived greater awareness of CGM-related challenges and patient experiences, suggesting that application-based activities can support patient-centred learning in pharmacy curricula.

References

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2024). 7. Diabetes technology: Standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes care, 47(Suppl 1), S126–S144. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-S007

Ehrhardt, N., & Al Zaghal, E. (2020). Continuous glucose monitoring as a behavior modification tool. Clinical Diabetes: A publication of the American Diabetes Association, 38(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd19-0037

ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Cusi, K., Das, S. R., Gibbons, C. H., Giurini, J. M., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E. L., Kahan, S., Khunti, K., Kosiborod, M., Leon, J., Lyons, S. K., Murdock, L., … on behalf of the American Diabetes Association (2023). Introduction and methodology: Standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes care, 46(Suppl 1), S1–S4. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-Sint

Folz, H. N., Lee, S., & Sherrill, C. H. (2025). Student pharmacist counseling performance after hands-on continuous glucose monitoring education: A multi-institutional pragmatic randomised study. Patient Education and Counseling, 131, 108578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108578

Keating, D., McWilliams, S., Hynes, C., Clarke, M., & Strawbridge, J. (2019). Pharmacy students' reflections on an experiential learning visit to a psychiatric hospital. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(5), 6784. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6784

Kerr, J.L., Stahnke, A.M., & Behnen, E.M. (2015). Assessing empathy and self-efficacy levels of pharmacy students in an elective diabetes management course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79.

Knezevich, E., Fuji, K. T., Larson, K., & Muniz, G. (2022). A cross-sectional survey study examining the provision of continuous glucose monitoring education in U.S. Doctor of Pharmacy programs. Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 10(6), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy10060174

Kolanczyk, D. M., Merlo, J. R., Bradley, B., Flannery, A. H., Gibson, C. M., McBane, S., Murphy, J. A., Noble, J. M., Noble, M. B., Patton, H. M., Rosselli, J. L., Stone, R. H., & Thornby, K. A. (2024). 2023 Update to the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Pharmacotherapy Didactic Curriculum Toolkit. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy: JACCP, 7(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1930

Lacy, M. E., Lee, K. E., Atac, O., Heier, K., Fowlkes, J., Kucharska-Newton, A., & Moga, D. C. (2024). Patterns and trends in continuous glucose monitoring utilisation among commercially insured individuals with type 1 diabetes: 2010-2013 to 2016-2019. Clinical diabetes: a publication of the American Diabetes Association, 42(3), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0051

Lanning, M. S., Tanenbaum, M. L., Wong, J. J., & Hood, K. K. (2020). Barriers to continuous glucose monitoring in people with type 1 diabetes: Clinician perspectives. Diabetes spectrum: A publication of the American Diabetes Association, 33(4), 324–330. https://doi.org/10.2337/ds19-0039

Park, J. J., Guttmann-Bauman, I., Chun, A., Pandharpurkar, T. H., & Mullin, R. (2023). 723-P: Patient-reported barriers to continuous glucose monitor usage. Diabetes, 72(Supplement_1). https://doi.org/10.2337/db23-723-p

Parker, D., Fontem, A., Ojong, E., & Pope, J. (2019). Impact of diabetes simulation on empathy in pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(1), 6432. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6432

Sanford, K., & Rivers, A. S. (2020). Treatment adherence perception questionnaire: Assessing patient perceptions regarding their adherence to medical treatment plans. Psychological Assessment, 32(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000782

Schwinghammer, T. L., Crannage, A. J., Boyce, E. G., Bradley, B., Christensen, A., Dunnenberger, H. M., Fravel, M., Gurgle, H., Hammond, D. A., Kwon, J., Slain, D., & Wargo, K. A. (2016). The 2016 ACCP Pharmacotherapy didactic curriculum toolkit. Pharmacotherapy, 36(11), e189–e194. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1846

Sherrill, C. H., Houpt, C. T., Dixon, E. M., & Richter, S. J. (2020). Effect of pharmacist-driven professional continuous glucose monitoring in adults with uncontrolled diabetes. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 26(5), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.5.600

Sherrill, C. H., Lee, S., & Bradley, C. L. (2022). Design and development of a continuous glucose monitoring educational module for students and practicing pharmacists. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 14(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.11.021

Varman, S. D., Cliff, D. P., Jones, R. A., Hammersley, M. L., Zhang, Z., Charlton, K., & Kelly, B. (2021). Experiential learning interventions and healthy eating outcomes in children: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010824

Whitley H. P. (2012). Active-learning diabetes simulation in an advanced pharmacy practice experience to develop patient empathy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 203. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610203

Westrick, S. C., Harris, T., Hastings, T., Zhao, Y., Diggs, K., & Shah, R. (2022). Evaluation of a poverty-focused educational program and simulation for pharmacists. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 14(3), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2022.01.020

Downloads

Published

09-03-2026

How to Cite

Sorvillo, A., Ford, A., & Leibfried, M. (2026). Exploring the educational value of a continuous glucose monitoring wear experience in pharmacy students: A qualitative study. Pharmacy Education, 26(1), p. 152–160. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2026.261.152160

Issue

Section

Research Article