Developing and evaluating pharmacist prescribing supervision for foundation trainee pharmacists in South East London

Authors

  • William Swain UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom & Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Annabel Healey Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom & Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom & King’s College London University, London, United Kingdom
  • Kai-loke Chan King’s Health Partners, London, United Kingdom
  • Sarah Chapman King’s College London University, London, United Kingdom
  • Sangeeta Bhagawati King’s College London University, London, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2026.261.269280

Keywords:

Clinical competence, Decision making, Education, Pharmacy, Prescriber autonomy, Scope of practice

Abstract

Background: In response to the General Pharmaceutical Council's new standards requiring pharmacists to qualify as independent prescribers at registration in the UK, the South East London Prescribing Integration Project aimed to address the resulting challenges in supervision capacity and training design for Foundation Trainee Pharmacists (FTPs).

Methods: A multi-phase programme was co-designed with stakeholders from general practice, hospitals, and community pharmacies. It involved creating a prescribing training workbook for FTPs, a specialised training package for Designated Prescribing Practitioner (DPP), and a multi-sector pilot, all based on a new autonomy-focused framework. A mixed-methods evaluation was conducted using survey data, learning logs, and progress reviews, although qualitative findings from focus groups are not included in this paper.

Results: Fifty-eight pharmacists attended the DPP training, with 44 participating in the pilot and 42 providing survey data. The training significantly improved DPP preparedness (p < 0.001), and FTPs logged over 860 hours of learning. Six supervision dimensions were established based on responses, emphasising direct supervision, protected learning time, and the integration of training.

Conclusion: The programme provides evidence of the feasibility and potential value of a co-designed model for supervision for foundation-level pharmacists grounded in a collaborative (low autonomy) prescriber endpoint. Findings offer practical insights to inform national implementation and policy development.

References

General Pharmaceutical Council. (2021). Standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists. General Pharmaceutical Council. https://assets.pharmacyregulation.org/files/2024-01/Standards%20for%20the%20initial%20education%20and%20training%20of%20pharmacists%20January%202021%20final%20v1.4.pdf

Health Education England. (2022). Independent prescribing scoping survey LaSE – acute trusts. Health Education England. https://www.lasepharmacy.hee.nhs.uk/dyn/_assets/_folder4/early-careers-tpd-programme-of-work-21-23/independent-prescribing-scoping/hee_lase_independent_prescribing_scoping_report_acute_trusts.pdf

Health Research Authority. (n.d.). Is my study research? Decision tool. https://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/

NHS England. (2024). Prescribing supervision and assessment in the foundation trainee pharmacist programme from 2025/26. NHS England. https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Prescribing%20Supervision%20and%20Assessment%20in%20the%20Foundation%20Trainee%20Pharmacist%20Programme%20JAN%202024%20V1.2.pdf

Bullock, B., Donovan, P., Mitchell, C., Whitty, J. A., & Coombes, I. (2019). The impact of a pharmacist on post-take ward round prescribing and medication appropriateness. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 41(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0775-9

Forsyth, P., Baker, J., Saadat, W., & Radley, A. (2026). Professional autonomy in pharmacists: Independence within interdependence. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 22(1), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.10.005

Hartjes, M. G., Richir, M. C., Cazaubon, Y., Donker, E. M., Likic, R., Pers, Y. M., Piët, J. D., Ponti, F. D., Raasch, W., Rychlícková, J., Sanz, E. J., Schwaninger, M., Wallerstedt, S. M., & Tichelaar, J. (2024). Enhancing therapeutic reasoning: key insights and recommendations for education in prescribing. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1360. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11590475/

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Jarmain, S., Moreno-Chamorro, D., & Piggin, C. (2023). The role of the designated prescribing supervisor: An evaluation. Journal of Prescribing Practice, 5(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.12968/jprp.2023.5.2.68

Jebara, T., McIntosh, T., Stewart, F., Osprey, A., Bruce, R., & Cunningham, S. (2022). Designated prescribing practitioners: A theory-based cross-sectional study of stakeholders’ views on implementation of a novel pharmacy regulator mandated preceptorship model. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 44(5), 1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01467-8

McDermott, I., Schafheutle, E., & Willis, S. (2024). Supporting newly qualified pharmacists in transitioning to independent practice: a qualitative analysis of the role of supervision. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 32(Suppl 1), i11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riae013.014

Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(12), 986–992. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411

Palinkas, L. A., Mendon, S. J., & Hamilton, A. B. (2019). Innovations in mixed methods evaluations. Annual Review of Public Health, 40, 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215

Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Styles, M., Hindi, A. M. K., Schafheutle, E. I., et al. (2022). Educational supervision to support pharmacy professionals’ learning and practice of advanced roles. BMC Medical Education, 22, 308. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03385-z

Styles, M., Schafheutle, E., Willis, S., & Shaw, M. (2023). Pharmacy professionals’ perceptions of educational supervision in primary care through the lens of Proctor’s model. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 503. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04398-8

Taiwo, M., Olowu, A., Olanlokun, Y. O., & Timothy, O. (2021). Clinical decision-making autonomy of pharmacists in decentralized models of healthcare administration and risk management. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 12(3), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2021.12.3.0721

Woit, C., Yuksel, N., & Charrois, T. L. (2020). Competence and confidence with prescribing in pharmacy and medicine: A scoping review. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 28(4), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12595

Downloads

Published

29-05-2026

How to Cite

Swain, W., Healey, A., Chan, K.- loke, Chapman, S., & Bhagawati, S. (2026). Developing and evaluating pharmacist prescribing supervision for foundation trainee pharmacists in South East London. Pharmacy Education, 26(1), p. 269–280. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2026.261.269280

Issue

Section

Programme Description