Overcoming Resistance to Networked Learning and Teaching Modalities—A Longitudinal Comparison of Changing Teaching Staff Attitudes Towards Learning Technologies

Authors

  • Katie Herson Information Services, University of Brighton, Watts Building, Moulsecoomb, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK
  • Andrew W. Lloyd Information Services, University of Brighton, Watts Building, Moulsecoomb, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK
  • Robert Stanier Information Services, University of Brighton, Watts Building, Moulsecoomb, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK
  • Michael Hal Sosabowski School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Moulsecoomb, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK

Keywords:

Teaching staff attitudes, Computers, ICT, Learning and teaching, Teaching staff

Abstract

This article considers a comparison of questionnaire survey results from teaching staff in the 1998 Department of Pharmacy teaching staff cohort with the same School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences cohort four years later (2002) at the University of Brighton. The effective- ness of solutions—proposed in previous work—seeking to overcome staff resistance to using computer-based learning and teaching methods is evaluated. It is reported that all staff now use e-mail, with half regularly doing so to communicate with or in response to communication from students. There is a shift to staff using more Computer Aided Learning (CAL) packages in their teaching, with a much wider range of teaching media in use.

Conclusions are drawn that identified an increased awareness among staff as to what computer-based learning and teaching methods can do and how they can be integrated into existing teaching. A move away from technical and hardware barriers towards more pedagogical issues of learning technology use is identified. Suggestions, such as increased one-to-one support and training and good-practice dissemination, are proposed to enable the school to achieve its aim of allowing all staff to make appropriate choices regarding the use of learning technologies within their teaching.

References

Abate, M.A., Meyer-Stout, P.J., Stamatakis, M.K., Gannett, P.M. and Dunsworth, T.S. (2000) “Development and evaluation of computerized problem-based learning cases emphasizing basic science concepts”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 64(1), 74–81.

Brakels, J., van Daalen, E., Dik, W., Dopper, S., Lohman, F., van Peppen, Peerdeman, S., Peet, D.J., Sjoer, E., van Valkenburg, W. and van de Ven, M. (2002) “Implementing ICT in education faculty-wide”, European Journal of Engineer- ing Education 27(1), 63–76.

Cha ́ vez, H., Sa ́ nchez, P., Telha, C., Puelles, C. and Thielemann, A.M. (2002) “Applications of internet to teaching-learning through the use of web pages”, Pharmacy Education 2(4), 205–208.

Creanor, L. and Littlejohn, A. (2000) “A cross-institutional approach to staff development in Internet communication”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 16(3), 271–279.

Gibbins, S. (2002) “A web-based resource to support learning and teaching of practical molecular biology” MPhil student thesis, University of Brighton (Brighton).

Herson, K., Sosabowski, M.H., Lloyd, A.W., Flowers, S., Paine, C. and Newton, B. (2000) “Implementation strategies for educational Intranet resources”, British Journal of Educational Technology 31(1), 47–55.

Kasiar, J.B., Schroeder, S.L. and Holstad, S.G. (2002) “Comparison of traditional and web-based course evaluation processes in a required, team-taught pharmacotherapy course”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 66(3), 268–270.

Littlejohn, A.H. (2002) “Improving continuing professional development in the use of ICT”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18(2), 166–174.

Olivier, G.W.J., Herson, K. and Sosabowski, M.H. (2001) “WebMark—a fully automated method of submission, assessment, grading and commentary for laboratory practical scripts”, Journal of Chemical Education 78(12), 1699–1703.

O’Neil, C.K. and Poirier, T.I. (2000) “On-line Doctor of Pharmacy program for pharmacy practitioners: development and evaluation of six pilot courses”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 64(3), 272–276.

Schwieso, J. (1993) “Staff usage of information technology in a faculty of higher-education—a survey and case-study”, Educational & Training Technology International 30(1), 88–94.

Sosabowski, M.H., Herson, K. and Lloyd, A.W. (1998a) “Implementation and student assessment of Intranet-based learning resources”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 62(3), 302–306.

Sosabowski, M.H., Herson, K., Lloyd, A.W. and Bell, P. (1998b) “An evaluation of information technology use among first- year pharmacy students”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 62(4), 433–438.

Sosabowski, M.H., Herson, K. and Lloyd, A.W. (1999) “Identifying and overcoming staff resistance to computer-based learning and teaching methods—shedding millstones to achieve milestones”, Active Learning 9, 26–31.

Sowinski, K.M., Scott, S.A. and Carlstedt, B.C. (2000) “An Internet training module for traditional and non-traditional Doctor of Pharmacy students: content and evaluation”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 64(1), 15–19.

Steel, J. and Hudson, A. (2001) “Educational technology in learning and teaching: the perceptions and experiences of teaching staff”, Innovations in Education and Teaching Inter- national 38(2), 103–111.

Wellman, G.S. and Larson, R. (2002) “Using web-based prescrip- tion simulations as an active learning tool in an integrated practice skills laboratory”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 66(4), 411–415.

Wright, D.E. (2000) “Pharmacists perceptions of situated learning in an Internet-based continuing education program”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 64(4), 397–403.

Downloads

Published

30-05-2003

How to Cite

Herson, K., Lloyd, A. W., Stanier, R., & Sosabowski, M. H. (2003). Overcoming Resistance to Networked Learning and Teaching Modalities—A Longitudinal Comparison of Changing Teaching Staff Attitudes Towards Learning Technologies. Pharmacy Education, 3(3). Retrieved from https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/36

Issue

Section

Research Article