Changes in teaching strategies to accommodate a new generation of learner: A case study
Keywords:
Millennial Student, Interactive, Case Scenarios, Computer-Based, Instructional Videos, Pharmacy, Technology, Problem-Based LearningAbstract
Generational diversity is found throughout the classrooms of higher education. The differences in generational characteristics may affect the educational experience and how one approaches learning and teaching. Faculty should be aware of these characteristics and may need to adapt their learning environment to fit the needs of today’s learner. The millennial learner is accustomed to the assimilation of technology in the classroom and how it may facilitate learning. The purpose of the study was to incorporate technology and active learning in the classroom. An interactive computer- based case video scenario was created on the topic of pain management. The interactive computer-based case was compared to our standard paper case-based approach in third-year student pharmacy students. Pre- and post-tests, delivered via a survey, were used to assess the impact of video technology on student pharmacist’s knowledge of pain. The pre- and post-tests were completed by 103 students, which was a 99% response rate. Analysis of covariance was conducted and showed there were no significant differences in post-test scores between video and paper groups. The majority of students (96%) perceived the video as equivalent to or better than the paper case in usefulness for their learning and student feedback suggested providing both the video and paper handout to aid in learning. Pharmacy educators should consider the incorporation of technology as a conduit for interactive learning. The addition of a computerised-case may allow millennial students to relate learning to their own generation and previous learning experiences.
References
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. (2016). Graduating Student Survey (online). Available at: http:// www.aacp.org/resources/ research/institutionalresearch/Documents/GSS_2016_National%20Summary %20Report_for%20web%2020160714.pdf. Accessed 4th February, 2017.
Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bergin, A. & Fors, U. (2003). Interactive simulated patient—an advanced tool for student-activated learning in medicine and healthcare. Computers & Education, 40(4), 361-376.
Black, A. (2010). Gen Y: Who They Are and How They Learn, Educational Horizons (online).Available at: http:// files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ8724 87.pdf. Accessed 4th February, 2017.
Chi, D., Pickrell, J. & Riedy, C. (2014). Student Learning Outcomes Associated with Video vs. Paper Cases in a Public Health Dentistry Course. Journal of Dental Education, 78(1), 24-30.
De Leng, B., Dolmans, D., Van de Wiel, M., Muijtjens, A. & Van Der Vleuten, C. (2007), How video cases should be used as authentic stimuli in problem-based medical education. Medical Education, 41, 181–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02671.x
D’Souza, M. & Rodrigues, P. (2015). Engaging Millennial Students in an Engineering Classroom using Extreme pedagogy. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(24), 1-6.
Howe, N. & Strauss W. (1993). Millennials Rising: The Next Greatest Generation. New York: Vintage Books.
Jonas-Dwyer, D. & Pospisil, R. (2004). The millennial effect: Implications for academic development. In Proceedings of the 2004 annual international conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), pp. 356-366.
Mangold, K. (2007). Educating a new generation: Teaching baby boomer faculty about millennial students. Nurse Educator, 32(1), 21-23.
Martin, M. & Monaco, M. (2007). The Millennial Student: A New Generation of Learners. Athletic Training Education Journal, 2, 42-46.
Pardue K. & Morgan P. (2008). Millennials considered: a new generation, new approaches, and implications for nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(2), 74-79.
Partridge, H. & Hallam, G. (2006) ‘Educating the Millennial generation for evidence based information practice’, Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 400–419. doi: 10.1108/07378830610692163.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. MCB University Press, Marc Prensky.
Richards J. (2010). Tips for teaching millennial students in your higher ed class. National Social Science Association (online). Available at: http://www.nssa.us/ tech_journal/volume_1-2/vol1-2_article8.htm. Accessed 4th February, 2017.
Shih, W. & Allen, M. (2007). Working with Generation- D: adopting and adapting to cultural learning and change. Library Management, 28(1/2), 89-100. doi: 10.1108/01435120710723572
Sharp, L. (2012). Stealth Learning: Unexpected Learning Opportunities Through Games. Journal of Instructional Research, 1, 42-48. doi:10.9743/jir.2013.6
Werth, E.P., & Werth, L. (2011). Effective training for millennial students. Adult Learning, 22(3), 12-19.
Wiggins, G.P. & McTighe, J. (2012). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
