Development of a tool to evaluate Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience preceptors in the clinical setting at a United States college of pharmacy: A pilot study
Keywords:Clinical Teaching, Experiential Education, Peer Evaluation
AbstractIntroduction: Peer evaluation of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) preceptors is challenging. This pilot project sought to develop and implement a tool for peer evaluation of APPE preceptors using pharmacy residents as evaluators at one College of Pharmacy in the United States. Development and Use of Evaluation Tool: A tool was developed using established preceptor evaluation tools to evaluate a convenience sample of APPE preceptors. Pharmacy residents were instructed on the use of the tool then used the tool to evaluate the preceptors during a one hour discussion with the student. Evaluation: Twenty-one evaluations were completed. Most preceptor evaluations were favourable on a Likert scale indicating agree or strongly agree, but about 10% of responses selected were “not applicable”. Pharmacy residents found the preceptor evaluation tool was easy to administer. Conclusion: Preceptor evaluations conducted by residents are a potential way to provide peer evaluations. Further studies need to be conducted to validate this tool with student and supervisor evaluation
American Council on Pharmaceutical Education [APCE]. (2007). Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree (online). Available at: https://www. acpe-accredit.org/pdf/S2007Guidelines2.0_Changes IdentifiedInRed.pdf. Accessed 20th June, 2012.
American Society of Health-System Pharmacy [ASHP]. (2012). Preceptor and learning experience evaluation form (online). Available at: http://www.ashp.org/ menu/Accreditation/ResidencyAccreditation. Accessed 20th June, 2012.
Beckman, T. & Mandrekar, J. (2005). The interpersonal, cognitive, and efficiency domains of clinical teaching: construct validity of a multidimensional scale. Medical Education, 39,1221-9.
Conigliaro, R. & Stratton, T. (2010). Assessing the quality of clinical teaching: a preliminary study. Medical Education, 44, 279-86.
Fluit, C., Blohuis, S., Groi, R., Laan, R. & Wensing, M. (2010). Assessing the Quality of Clinical Teachers: A systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(12), 1337-45.
Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Hsu, C.-C. & Sandford, B. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(10).
Iblher, P., Zupanic, M., Hartel, C., Heinze, H., Schmucker, P. & Fischer, M. (2011). The Questionaire “SFDP26-German”: a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching? GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung, 28(2), Doc30.
Secomb, J.A. (2007). Systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17,107-16.