A multi-group modelling investigation of pharmacy practice training on the learning approach of Japanese pharmacy students

Authors

Keywords:

Learning Approach, Multi-group Modelling, Pharmacy Practice Training, Pharmacy Students

Abstract

Background: The newly implemented six-year pharmacy course entails pre-clinical training and clinical rotation for fourth- and fifth-year students, respectively. Therefore, sustained learning motivation is crucial and is reflected through observed changes in the students’ learning approach.

Objective: To investigate the effect of pharmacy practice training (PPT) programmes on the learning approach of fourth to sixth-year Japanese pharmacy students.

Methods: A revised two-factor study process questionnaire was administered to fourth- to sixth-year pharmacy students at the Josai International University. Changes in students’ deep and surface learning approaches pre- and post-PPT were investigated using multi-group modelling.

Results: The ‘deep approach’ mean score significantly increased in sixth-year students. The effect size of the difference was medium (Cohen’s d=0.51). The ‘surface approach’ mean score decreased with no significance per school year.

Conclusion: The PPT programmes raised students’ ‘deep approach’ learning; thus, students could create meaning in their learning and construct ideas independently during PPT. 

 

Author Biographies

Shigeo Yamamura, Josai International University, Togane, Chiba

Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Rieko Takehira, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Shirogane, Tokyo

Department of Medical Psychology, Pharmaceutical Education Research Center

References

Biggs, J., Kember, D. & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R- SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Chen, Y., Henning, M., Yielder, J., Jones, R., Wearn, A. & Weller, J. (2015). Progress testing in the medical curriculum: students' approaches to learning and perceived stress. BMC Medical Education, 15, 147.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Crossley, M.L. & Mubarik, A. (2002). A comparative investigation of dental and medical student’s motivation towards career choice. British Dental Journal, 193, 471– 473.

Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Loyens, S.M.M., Marcq, H. & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21 (5), 1087-1112.

Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with M-Plus. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Japan Pharmaceutical Association. (2015). Annual report of the Japan Pharmaceutical Association 2014–2015 (online). Available at: http://www.nichiyaku.or.jp/e/data/ anuual_report2014e.pdf. Accessed 23rd October, 2017.

Liu, M. (2007). Chinese students’ motivation to learn English at the tertiary level. Asian EFL Journal, 9, 126– 146.

Mann, K.V. (1999). Motivation in medical education: How theory can inform our practice. Academic Medicine, 74, 237–239.

Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and Instruction (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice Hall.

Mogre, V. & Amalba, A. (2014). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ2F) in Ghanaian medical students. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 11, 19.

Mokhtar, S.B., Choo, G.S., Husain, M.Y. & Rahman, S. (2010). The Bahasa Melayu R-SPQ-2F: A preliminary evidence of its validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 151–155.

Ryu, E. (2015). Multiple-group analysis approach to testing group difference in indirect effects. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 484–493.

Schumacker, R. & Lomax, R. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Shah, C., Joshi, N., Mehta, H.B. & Gokhle, P.A. (2011). Learning styles adopted by medical students. International Research Journal of Pharmacy, 2(12), 227–229.

Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, A. & Schwartz, S.H. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality & Quantity, 43, 599-616.

Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W. & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468–483.

Yamamura, S. & Takehira, R. (2017). Effect of practical training on the learning motivation profile of Japanese pharmacy students using structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Healthcare Professionals, 14, 2.

Yardimci, F., Bektaş, M., Özkütük, N., Muslu, G. K., Gerçeker, G.Ö. & Başbakkal, Z. (2017). A study of the relationship between the study process, motivation resources, and motivation problems of nursing students in different educational systems. Nurse Education Today. 48, 13-18.

Downloads

Published

24-10-2017

How to Cite

Yamamura, S., & Takehira, R. (2017). A multi-group modelling investigation of pharmacy practice training on the learning approach of Japanese pharmacy students. Pharmacy Education, 17. Retrieved from https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/507

Issue

Section

Research Article