Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Educational Methods (E-Learning, Lectures and Blended) on Pharmacy Students' Knowledge of Non-prescription Drugs
Keywords:E-learning, Blended, lecture, non-prescription, OTC, pharmacy
Non-prescription medications are increasingly used all over the world and therefore pharmacists should be able to counsel the patients on their proper uses and safety. Pharmacy students take courses in this area and given its importance; teaching innovations and different methods are used by schools and institutions. The present study was designed to compare the effectiveness of different delivery methods of the knowledge of non-prescription drugs.
This interventional study was conducted with pharmacy students of University of Medical Sciences in the year of 2015-16. In this study, topics were divided into three groups, (lecture-based, electronic teaching and blended approach). At the beginning and end of each session, pre and post-tests were performed and the students took a final exam at the end of the semester. The mean difference of the final exam scores of topics taught by each method was compared. Also, the possible improvements of the students' posttest scores compared to their pre-tests were analyzed.
The Students' final exam mean scores were 16.166±0.332 in e-learning group, 13.751±0.164 in lecture group and 16.388±0.195 in blended methods group (all out of 20 points). The results show that the e-learning and blended methods had a more positive effect on the scores of the final exam of pharmacy students in knowledge of non-prescription medication course.
ConclusionThis study demonstrates that a blended learning method and an e-learning approach can positively influence the student’s knowledge towards non-prescription drugs.
Bahadorani M, Y. A., Changiz T. (2006). the effectiveness of three methods of teaching medline to medical student: online, face to face and combined educational method. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 6(2), 35-43.
Emami H, A. M., Asousheh A. (2009). Electronic learning in medical education. pejouhesh, 33(2), 102-111.
Fathnejad, F., & Mokhtari, A. (2007). virtual Education: The third generation. Monthly magazine of tadbir, 18(183).
Jaffari M. (2012). comparison of lecture and blended teaching methods on learning and satisfaction of medical students in biochemistry course. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 12(7), 488-497.
Jilardidamavandi A, M. A., Elias H, Daud SM, SHabani J. (2011). Academic achievement of students with different learning styles. international Journal of Psychological studi, 3(2), 186.
Kermaniyan F, M. F., Iravani S, Markazi Morghadam N, Shayan Sh. (2008). comparing lecture and problem-based learning methods in teaching limb anatomy to first year medical students. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 7(2), 379-388.
Khan, I.,& Fareed, A. (2001). problem-based learning variant:transition phase for a large institution. J Pak Med Assoc, 51(8), 271-274.
Khazaei, S., Rashedi, E., & Barati, E. (2012). Blended learning approaches in medical science: a review article. Pajouhan scientific journal, 11(1), 6-11.
Kopacek, K. B., Dopp, A. L., Dopp, J. M., Vardeny, O., Sims, J. J. (2010). Pharmacy Students’ Retention of Knowledge and Skills Following Training in Automated External Defibrillator Use. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(6), 109.
Lee, B-C., Yoon, J-O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners acceptance of e-learning in south korea: theories and results. Computer& Education, 53(4), 1320-1329.
Manolis Chris, Burns David j, Assudani, Rashmi, chinta Ravi. (2013). Assessing experimental learning styles: a methodological reconstruction and validation of the kolb learning style inventory. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 44-52. McMillan S., King S., Chpperfiled J. (2011) Teaching an over-the-counter medicines course with the learning activity management system (LAMS): student perspectives of a supplemental blended learning approach. Proceedings of ICERI2011 Conference. 000135-000144.
Momeni Danaei Sh., Zarshenas L., Oshagh M, Omid Khoda SM. (2011). which method of teaching would be better: cooperative or lecture? Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(1), 24-31.
Nonprescriptions Medicine Academy Steering Committee, Ambizas, E. M., Bastianelli, K. M. S., Ferreri, S. P., Haines, S. L., Orr, K. K., … Wilhelm, M. (2014). Evolution of Self-Care Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(2), 28. http://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78228
Noori A, Kouti L, Akbari F , Assarian M, Rakhshan A, Eslami K, (2014). a review on different virtual learning methods in pharmacy education. journal of pharmaceutical care, 2(2), 77-82.
Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ., Leipzig RM. (2006). The impact of E-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207-212.
SADEGHI, R., SEDAGHAT, M. M., & SHA AHMADI, F. (2014). Comparison of the effect of lecture and blended teaching methods on students’ learning and satisfaction. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 2(4), 146–150. Salter, S. M., Karia, A., Sanfilippo, F. M., & Clifford, R. M. (2014). Effectiveness of E-learning in Pharmacy Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(4), 83. http://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78483 Stricker, D., Weibel, D., & Wissmath, B. (2011). Efficient learning using a virtual learning environment in a university class. Computer& Education, 56(2), 495-504.
Thurmond, V., & Wambach, K. (2004). Understanding interactions in distance education: a review of the literature. International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 1(1).
Thurmond VA. (2003). Defining interaction and strategies to enhance interactions in web-based courses. Nurse Educator, 28(5), 237-241.
Wu PH, K. C., Wu PL, Wu TH. (2006). design a competence-based Networked Learning system:using sequence control as example. CURRENT DEvelopments in Technology-Assisted Education, 2, 787.
Zolfaghari, M., Mehrdad, N., Parsa Yekta, Z., Salmani Barugh, N., & Bahrani, N. (2007). The effect of lecture and E-learning methods on learning mother and child health course in nursing students. Iranian journal of medical education, 7(1), 31-39.