Deep approach to learning of pharmacy students: A multilevel analysis
Keywords:Deep Approach to Learning, Pharmacy Students, Innovative teaching, Student Workload, Task Orientation, Mastery Approach Goal
Introduction: A deep approach to learning (DAL) is a critical foundation for enhancing pharmacy students’ academic performance and professional outcomes. This study at two universities in Thailand examined student-level and course- level factors affecting pharmacy students’ DAL using the Biggs 3P model as a theoretical framework.
Methods: The measurement focused on DAL, achievement goal orientation, learning environment, appropriate workload, and assessment was sent to all 733 pharmacy students. Eight to twelve students were randomly selected to evaluate one of the 67 first semester courses available at two universities. Multilevel Structural Equation Modelling was used for analysis.
Results: There were 733 questionnaires returned of which 536 were used. Mastery approach goal (β=0.536**), performance approach goal (β=0.039**), innovation (β=0.409**), appropriate workload (β=0.349**), and task orientation (β=0.201**) had positive significant relationships with the DAL in pharmacy students.
Conclusion: Educators should increase innovative teaching approaches, optimise students’ workload, provide task orientation, and encourage students to be goal striving persons to facilitate deep learning.
Al-Mamary, Y.H., Shamsuddin, A., Abdul Hamid, N.A. & Al-Maamari, M.H. (2015). Adoption of Management Information Systems in Context of Yemeni Organizations: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Digital Information Management, 13(6).
￼Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K. & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243-260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
Bamwesiga, P.M., Dahlgren, L.-O. & Fejes, A. (2012). Students as learners through the eyes of their teachers in Rwandan higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(4), 503-521. doi:10.1080/026 01370.2012.689377
Barros, R., Monteiro, A., Nejmedinne, F. & Moreira, J. A. (2013). The Relationship between Students’ Approach to Learning and Lifelong Learning. Psychology, 04(11), 792-797. doi:10.4236/psych.2013.411113
Biggs, J.B. (1989). Approaches to the Enhancement of Tertiary Teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 8(1),7-25.doi:10.1080/0729436890080102
Biggs, J.B., Kember, D. & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R SPQ- 2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133-149. doi:10.1348/000709901158433
Chapman, J. & Aspin, D. (1997). Schools as Centres of Lifelong Learning for All (online). Available at: http:// files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED411884.pdf. Accessed 25th May, 2016.
Charik, K. (2006). Computer classroom learning environments and students' attitudes toward computer courses in tertiary institutions in Thailand. Doctoral dissertation (online). Available at: https://espace.curtin. edu.au/handle/20. 500.11937/2505. Accessed 17th April, 2016.
Chen, P.-S.D., Lambert, A.D. & Guidry, K.R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232. doi:10.1016/ j.compedu.2009. 11.008
Chotima, M. & Blauw, J. (2016). The Influence of Materialism on Well-Being among Thai Adolescents. Scholar, 8(1).
Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal Theory, Motivation, and School Achievement: An Integrative Review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
Dart, B., Burnett, P., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., Smith, D. & McCrindle, A. (1999). Classroom learning environments and students' approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 2, 137-156.
Diseth, Å. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191-195. doi:10.1016/j. lindif.2011.01.003
Elias, R.Z. (2005). Students' Approaches to Study in Introductory Accounting Courses. Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 194-199. doi:10.3200/joeb.80.4.194- 199
Fackler, S. & Malmberg, L.-E. (2016). Teachers' self- efficacy in 14 OECD countries: Teacher, student group, school and leadership effects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 185-195. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.002
Garrison, D.R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Gijbels, D., Segers, M. & Struyf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36(5-6), 431-443. doi:10.1007/s 11251-008-9064-7
Graduate Careers Australia. (2013). 2013 CEQ Methodology (online). Available at: http:// www.graduatecareers.com.au/. Accessed 30th January, 2016.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (2003). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Halawi, L., McCarthy, R. & Moughalu, N. (2009). Student approaches to learning: An exploratory study. Issues in Information Systems, 10(1), 13-21.
Han, J.H. & Finkelstein, A. (2013). Understanding the effects of professors' pedagogical development with Clicker Assessment and Feedback technologies and the impact on students' engagement and learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 65, 64-76. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.002
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M.R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1).
Hox, J.J., Moerbeek, M. & van de Schoot, R. (2010). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, Second Edition: Taylor & Francis.
Hu, L.t. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Johnson, J.L. (2013). Self-authorship in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(4). doi:10.5688/ajpe77469
Junco, R., Heiberger, G. & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Kanjanawasee, S. (2011). Multi-Level Analysis. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Karagiannopoulou, E., Naka, K., Kamtsios, S., Savvidou, E. & Michalis, L. (2014). Medical students' approaches to learning before and after the cardiology problem-based learning practice. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education, 2(3), 152. doi:10.5455/jcme.20140928040405
￼￼￼￼￼￼￼￼￼￼￼￼Kelloway, E.K. (2014). Using Mplus for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher's Guide: SAGE Publications.
Kenny, D.A. (2015). Measuring Model Fit (online). Available at: http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm. Accessed 14th March, 2017.
Kuit, T. & Fildes, K. (2014). Changing curriculum design to engage students to develop lifelong learning skills in biology. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(2), 19-34.
Kusalanont, P. (2006). The learning styles of high school Thai and Australian students. Master's thesis, Kasetsart University, Business Administration Graduate School.
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K. & Cascallar, E. (2012). Looking at learning approaches from the angle of student profiles. Educational Psychology, 32(4), 493-513. doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.667770
Laguador, J.M. (2014). Cooperative learning approach in an outcomes-based environment. International Journal of Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, 2(2), 46-55.
Liem, A.D., Lau, S. & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self- efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486-512. doi:10.1016/j. cedpsych.2007.08.001
Lim, E.-L. & Hew, K.F. (2014). Students’ perceptions of the usefulness of an E-book with annotative and sharing capabilities as a tool for learning: a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 34-45. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.771969
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K. & Simons, R. (2002). University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27-52. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099359
Machado, L.A.C., Telles, R.W., Costa-Silva, L. & Barreto, S.M. (2016). Psychometric properties of Multidimensional Health Locus of Control - A and General Self-Efficacy Scale in civil servants: ELSA- Brasil Musculoskeletal Study (ELSA-Brasil MSK). Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 20(5), 451-460. doi:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0177
Makmee, P. (2016). Development of a Model of Organizational Effectiveness Measurement for Universities in ASEAN: Multilevel Structural Equation Model Analysis. Journal of the Researcher Association, 21(1), 34 – 48.
Mansouri, P. (2009). Nursing and midwifery baccalaureate students’ approaches to study. Journal of Medical Education, 6(1).
McKauge, L., Stupans, I., Owen, S.M., Ryan, G. & Woulfe, J. (2011). Building critical reflection skills for lifelong learning in the emergent landscape of a national registration and accreditation scheme. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 24(2), 235-240. doi:10.1177/ 0897190010397373
Muthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2015). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition: Muthén & Muthén.
Nair, C.S. & Fisher, D.L. (1999). A learning environment study of tertiary classrooms. Proceedings: Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Forum 1999.
Nair, C.S. & Fisher, D.L. (2000). Transition from Senior Secondary to Higher Education: A Learning Environment Perspective. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 435-450. doi:10.1007/BF02461561
Ntoumanis, N. & Myers, N.D. (2016). An Introduction to Intermediate and Advanced Statistical Analyses for Sport and Exercise Scientists: Wiley.
Oxnevad, S. (2017). 6 Instructional Shifts to Promote Deep Learning (online). Available at: http:// www.teachthought.com/learning/6-teaching-strategies-to- promote-deeper-learning/. Accessed 29th August, 2017.
Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T. & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students' approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(Pt.2), 269-282. doi:10.1348/ 000709909X476946
Pascarella, E.T. & Blaich, C. (2013). Lessons from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(2), 6-15. doi:10.1080/00091383.2013.764257
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C.T. (2008). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Poondej, C. (2014). Development of a Causal Model of Achievement Goal Orientations in Learning, Perceptions of Learning Environment in a General Education Classroom, and Learning Approaches toward Critical Thinking. Research Methodology & Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1-14.
Poondej, C., Koul, R. & Sujivorakul, C. (2013). Achievement goal orientation and the critical thinking disposition of college students across academic programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(4), 504-518. doi:10.1080/0309877x.2011.645463
Poondej, C. & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2016). Relationship between motivational goal orientations, perceptions of general education classroom learning environment, and deep approaches to learning. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37(2), 100-103. doi:10.1016/j.kjss.2015.01.001
Ratsameemonthon, L. (2015). The Achievement Goal Questionnaire- Revised for Thai college students and the Asian context. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(2), 369-386. doi:10.14204/ ejrep.36.14078
Rithilert, N. & Kaemkate, W. (2013). Effect of Achievement Goals and Mediators on Deep Learning Processes Achievement of Upper Secondary School Students. Competitive Analysis Causal Models, 8(1), 528-542.
Salamonson, Y., Attwood, N., Everett, B., Weaver, R. & Glew, P. (2013). Psychometric testing of the english language acculturation scale in first-year nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(10), 2309-2316. doi:10.1111/jan.12098
Schumacker, R.E. & Lomax, R.G. (2010). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Routledge.
Schunk, D.H., Pintrich, P.R. & Meece, J.L. (2010). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications: Pearson Education.
Smith, L., Krass, I., Sainsbury, E. & Rose, G. (2010). Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in undergraduate and graduate entry programs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(6), 106.
Smith, L., Saini, B., Krass, I., Chen, T., Bosnic- Anticevich, S. & Sainsbury, E. (2007). Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in an Australian university. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(6), 120.
Snijders, T.A.B. & Bosker, R.J. (2011). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling: SAGE Publications.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S. & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 279-294. doi:10.1016/j. learninstruc.2006.07.001
Tam, M. (1999). Promoting Deep Learning: A Conceptual Model. Learning Matters at Lingnan, April 1999, 7-8.
Tiwari, A., Chan, S., Wong, E., Wong, D., Chui, C., Wong, A. & Patil, N. (2006). The effect of problem-based learning on students’ approaches to learning in the context of clinical nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 26(5), 430-438. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2005.12.001
Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251-266. doi:10.1007/BF00132 290
Tsingos, C., Bosnic-Anticevich, S. & Smith, L. (2015). Learning styles and approaches: Can reflective strategies encourage deep learning? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(4), 492-504. doi:10.1016/j. cptl.2015.04.006
Varunki, M., Katajavuori, N. & Postareff, L. (2015). First-year students’ approaches to learning, and factors related to change or stability in their deep approach during a pharmacy course. Studies in Higher Education, 1-23. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1049140
Wang, J.-S., Pascarella, E.T., Nelson Laird, T.F. & Ribera, A.K. (2015). How clear and organized classroom instruction and deep approaches to learning affect growth in critical thinking and need for cognition. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1786-1807. doi:10.1080/0307 5079.2014.914911
Warburton, K. (2003). Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(1), 44-56. doi:10.1108/1467637031 0455332
Was, C. (2006). Academic Achievement Goal Orientation : Taking Another Look. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(10), 529-550.
Yerdelen Damar, S. & Aydın, S. (2015). Relations of Approaches to Learning with Perceptions of Learning Environment and Goal Orientations. Ted EĞİtİm Ve
Bİlİm, 40(179). doi:10.15390/eb.2015.4332