Learning Styles of Pharmacists: Impact on Career Decisions, Practice Patterns and Teaching Method Preferences

Authors

  • Zubin Austin Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 19 Russell Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A1

Keywords:

Learning styles, Learning preferences, Pharmacy education, Pharmacy practice

Abstract

This study examined possible associations between learning styles of pharmacists (as identified through Kolb’s Learning Styles Inventory (LSI) and the Pharmacists’ Inventory of Learning Styles (PILS)) and career decisions, practice patterns and teaching method preferences. A total of 166 pharmacists were involved in this study and completed either the LSI or the PILS, and a supplemental questionnaire. Of them, 33.7% of the respondents were identified as Assimilators, 32.5% as Convergers, 21.1% as Divergers and 12.1% as Accommodators. Results suggest that there is a statistically significant correlation between identified learning style and teaching method preferences as well as years since graduation. While there was no statistically significant correlation between learning styles and gender, career decisions or practice patterns, there does appear to be a trend that warrants further investigation. Implications for delivery of continuing education are discussed, since learning preferences for each group varied considerably.

References

Adamcik, B., Hurley, S. and Erramouspe, J. (1996) “Assessment of pharmacy students critical thinking and problem solving abilities”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 60, 87–93.

Austin, Z. (2002) “What is learnworthy? Lessons for group socialization theory for professional education and continuing professional development”, Pharmacy Education 2(4), 161–166.

Austin, Z. (2003) “Development and validation of the Pharmacists’ Inventory of Learning Styles (PILS)”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, (accepted for publication).

Blagg, J. (1985) “Cognitive styles and learning styles as predictors of academic success in a graduate allied health education program”, Journal of Allied Health 14, 89–98.

Felder, R. (1993) “Reaching the second tier—learning and teaching styles in college science education”, Journal of College Science Teaching 23, 286–290.

Felder, R. and Silverman, L. (1998) “Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education”, Engineering Education 78, 674 – 681.

Gardner, H. (1999) Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligence for the 21st Century (Basic Books, New York, NY).

Janing, J. (2001) “Linking teaching approaches and learning styles: how can it help students?”, Emergency Medical Services 30, 77–80.

Keane, M. (1993) “Preferred learning styles and study strategies in linguistically diverse baccalaureate nursing student popu- lation”, Journal of Nursing Education 32, 1072–1074.

Kolb, D. (1981) “Learning styles and disciplinary differences”, In: Chickering, A., ed, The Modern American College (Jossey- Bass, San Francisco, CA).

Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

Kolb, D. (1999) Learning Style Inventory version 3 (Experienced Based Learning Systems Inc., Hay/McBer Training Resources Group, Boston, MA).

Litzinger, M. and Osif, B. (1993) “Accommodating diverse learning styles: designing instruction for electronic information sources”, In: Shirato, L., ed, What is Good Instruction Now? Library Instruction for the 90s (Pierian Press, Ann Arbor, MI).

Norman, G. and Schmidt, H. (1992) “The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence”, Academic Medicine 67, 557–565.

Pungente, M., Wasan, K. and Moffett, C. (2002) “Using learning styles to evaluate first-year pharmacy students’ preferences toward different activities associated with problem-based learning approach”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 66, 119–1224.

Quenk, N. (2000) Essentials of Myers–Briggs Type Indicator Assessment (Wiley, New York, NY).

Published

12/12/2003

Issue

Section

Research Article