Learning approach and teaching style preferred by pharmacy students: Implications for educational strategies in Zambia
Keywords:
Approach to Learning, Teaching Style Preference, Pharmacy, Students, ZambiaAbstract
Introduction: Identifying how students’ approach their learning and ways they prefer to learn can enable educators enhance teaching and learning experiences for quality educational outcomes.
Aim: This study explored the learning approaches and teaching style preferences of pharmacy students in Zambia.
Methods: The research instrument was the ‘Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students’ (ASSIST) questionnaire. Data were collected from 147 undergraduate pharmacy students at University of Zambia and statistically analysed using Stata 13.
Results: Strategic learning approach was predominant among a majority (67%) of pharmacy students. Only 25% adopted a deep learning approach and 7% were surface learners. Learning approach was statistically significantly associated with course load (p=0.028) and programme stage (p=0.010). The majority (67%) preferred teaching that transmitted information while only 23% preferred teaching styles that encouraged and supported understanding of taught material. There was no statistical association between students’ learning approach and their teaching style preference (p=0.085).
Conclusion: The predominance of strategic learning approach and preference for teaching that transmitted information raises concerns on current educational strategies employed by both the curriculum and educators.
References
Beaten, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E. & Vanderbruggen, V. (2016). Student-centred learning environments: an investigation into student teachers’ instructional preferences and approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 19(1), 43-62. doi: 10.1007/s10984-015-9190-5
Bligh, D. (2002). What's the use of lectures? San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers
Brown, S., White, S., Wakeling, L. & Naiker, M. (2015). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) in an introductory course in chemistry. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 12(3), 1-12
Byrne, M., Flood, B. & Willis, P. (2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education, 11(1), 27-42. doi:10.1080/ 0963928021015325 4
Chonkar, S.P., Ha, T.C., Chu, S.S.H., Ng, A.X., Lim, M.L.S., Ee, T.X., Ng, M.J. & Tan, K.H. (2018). The predominant learning approaches of medical students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 17. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1122-5
Curtis, P., Taylor, G. & Harris, M. (2018). How preferred learning approaches change with time: a survey of GPs and GP specialist trainees. Education for Primary Care, 1- 6. doi:10.1080/14739879.2018.1461027
Elliot, A.J. & Church, M.A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218
Entwistle, N. (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the First Annual Conference of the Teaching and Learning Research Programme, Leicester (online). Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/ 00003220.htm
Entwistle, N., McCune, V. & Tait, H. (Updated March 2013). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Report of the Development and Use of the Inventories (online). Available at: http://www.researchgate. net/publication/260291730_ Approaches_and_Study_ Skills_Inventory_for_Students_(ASSIST)_(incorporating_ the_Revised_Approaches_to_Studying_Inventory_- _RASI
Entwistle, N., McCune, V. & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education; analytical abstractions and everyday experience, In Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. (Eds. R. Sternberg & L. Zhang). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers, pp. 103-136
Entwistle, N.J., McCune, V. & Hounsell, J. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings. Occassional Report 1: Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses Project (ETL). Coventry and Durham: University of Edinburgh.
Ezeala, C.C. (2016). Analysis of the undergraduate students’ learning environment in a medical school in Zambia [PhD Thesis] Doctor of Literature and Philosophy, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
FIP [International Pharmaceutical Federation]. (2014). Quality Assurance of
Pharmacy Education: the FIP Global Competency Framework (2nd ed.). The Hague: International Pharmaceutical Federation (online). Available at: https://fip.org/files/fip/PharmacyEducation/ Quality_Assurance/QA_Framework_2nd_Edition_ online_version.pdf
Frame, T.R., Cailor, S.M., Gryka, R.J., Chen, A.M., Kiersma, M. E. & Sheppard, L. (2015). Student perceptions of team-based learning vs traditional lecture- based learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(4), 51
Gilliam, E., Brunner, J.M., Jeffres, M.N., Nuffer, W. & Thompson, M. (2018). Assessing a longitudinal reflection curriculum: A case study of student self- awareness expressed through rotation goal achievement. INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy, 9(2), 5-5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v9i2.980
Gruppen, L., Irby, D.M., Durning, S.L. & Maggio, L.A. (2018). Interventions Designed to Improve the Learning Environment in the Health Professions: A Scoping Review. MedEdPublish, 7(3): 73. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000211.1
Halawi, L., McCarthy, R. & Muoghalu, N. (2009). Student approaches to learning: An exploratory study. Issues in Information Systems, 10(1), 13. Available at: http://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1355&context=publication
Hein, G. (1991). Constructivist learning theory. Paper presented at the CECA (International Committee of Museum Educators) Conference, Jerusalem Israel (online). Available at: http://www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/ resources/constructivistlearning.html
Kalungia, A.C., Muungo, L.T., Marshall, S., Apampa, B., May, C. & Munkombwe, D. (2019). Training of pharmacists in Zambia: Developments, curriculum structure and future developments. Pharmacy Education, 19(1), 69 - 78
Kuit, T. & Fildes, K. (2014). Changing curriculum design to engage students to develop lifelong learning skills in biology. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(2), 19-34. Available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3598 &context=smhpapers
Lublin, J. (2003). Good Practice in Teaching and Learning: Deep, surface and strategic approaches to learning. Dublin: Centre for Teaching and Learning, UCD Dublin (online). Available at: https://studylib.net/ doc/18290095/deep--surface-and-strategic-approaches- to-learning
Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In The experience of learning. (Es. F. Marton, D.J. Hounsell & N.J. Entwistle), Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, pp. 39-58
Michael, J. (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159-167. doi:10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Michael, J & Modell, H. (2003). Active Learning in Secondary and College Science Classrooms: A Working Model of Helping the Learning to Learn. 1st Edition. New York: Routledge
Mosca, C., Makkink, A. & Stein, C. (2015). Learning approaches used by students in an undergraduate emergency medical care programme. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 7(1), 55-57. Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajhpe/article/ download/124848/114361
Norcini, J.J., Lipner, R.S. & Grosso, L.J. (2013). Assessment in the context of licensure and certification. Teaching and learning in Medicine: An International Journal, 25(1), S62-S67. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.842909
Ofstad, W. & Brunner, L.J. (2013). Team-based learning in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(4), 70. doi:10.5688/ ajpe77470
Phanudulkitti, C., Farris, K.B., Makmee, P. & Kittisopee, T. (2018). Deep approach to learning of pharmacy students: A multilevel analysis. Pharmacy Education, 18(1), 99-109. Available at: http:// pharmacyeducation journal.org/pharmacyeducation/ article/view/585/498
Quintanilha, L.F., Costa, G.N. & Coutinho, M.R. (2018). Medical student perceptions about active methodologies in the study of physiology in medical schools in Salvador, Brazil. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(4), 693-696. doi:10.1152/advan. 00105.2018
Reid, W.A., Duvall, E. & Evans, P. (2005). Can we influence medical students’ approaches to learning? Medical Teacher, 27(5), 401-407. doi:10.1080/ 01421590500136410
Reid, W.A., Duvall, E. & Evans, P. (2007). Relationship between assessment results and approaches to learning and studying in year two medical students. Medical Education, 41(8), 754-762. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923. 2007.02801.x.
Samarakoon, L., Fernando, T., Rodrigo, C. & Rajapakse, S. (2013). Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC Medical Education, 13(1), 42. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920- 13-42
Subasinghe, S.D.L.P. & Wanniachchi, D.N. (2009). Approach to learning and the academic performance of a group of medical students–any correlation. Student Medical Journal (Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo), 3(1), 5-10. Available at: https:// med.cmb.ac.lk/SMJ/VOLUME%203%20DOWN LOADS/ Page%205-10%20-%20Approach%20to% 20learning%20and%20the%20academic%20performan ce%20of%20a%20group%20of%20medical%20student s%20-%20any%20correlation.pdf
Smith, L., Krass, I., Sainsbury, E. & Rose, G. (2010). Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in undergraduate and graduate entry programs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(6), 106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7406106
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57-70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1003548313194
Tsingos, C., Bosnic-Anticevich, S. & Smith, L. (2015). Learning styles and approaches: Can reflective strategies encourage deep learning? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(4); 492–504. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.04.006
Valadas, S.T., Almeida, L.S. & Araújo, A.M. (2017). The mediating effects of approaches to learning on the academic success of first-year college students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(6), 721-734. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 00313831.2016.1188146
Varunki, M., Katajavuori, N. & Postareff, L. (2017). First-year students’ approaches to learning, and factors related to change or stability in their deep approach during a pharmacy course. Studies in Higher Education, 42(2), 331-353. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.1080/ 03075079.2015.1049140
Walker, R., Spronken-Smith, R., Bond, C., McDonald, F., Reynolds, J. & McMartin, A. (2010). The impact of curriculum change on health sciences first year students’ approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 38(6), 707-722. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11251- 009-9092-y
Wang, J.-S., Pascarella, E.T., Nelson Laird, T.F. & Ribera, A.K. (2015). How clear and organized classroom instruction and deep approaches to learning affect growth in critical thinking and need for cognition. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1786-1807. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03075079.2014.914911
Wickramasinghe, D.P. & Samarasekera, D.N. (2011). Factors influencing the approaches to studying of preclinical and clinical students and postgraduate trainees. BMC Medical Education, 11(1), 22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-22
