Using portfolios to learn about prescribing: Qualitative insights into students’ experiences

Authors

  • Darren M. Ashcroft Centre for Innovation in Pratice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Jason Hall Centre for Innovation in Pratice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Keywords:

Pharmacy, prescribing, portfolio, qualitative analysis

Abstract

In the UK, pharmacists have recently started to take on new roles in relation to the prescribing of medicines. As a result, a reflective portfolio was developed and introduced into the final year of the undergraduate pharmacy curriculum at the University of Manchester to support the students’ learning about prescribing. This study reports on qualitative analysis of the prescribing portfolios, examining specifically the students’ perceptions of what they had learnt by completing the portfolio. In general, the students were in favour of using the portfolio to support their learning about prescribing, acknowledging that this had helped them to broaden their appreciation of all the stages in the prescribing process, and bridge differences between the taught components in the degree course and practice experience. Preparing the portfolio had also encouraged the students to build on their learning from other modules, recognise the inherent uncertainty associated with decision-making and to reflect on their future learning needs in relation to prescribing.

References

Ashcroft, D. M., & Hall, J. (2006). Pharmacy students’ attitudes and views about portfolio-based learning: A questionnaire survey. Pharmacy Education, 6(1), 1–5.

British National Formulary (2005). Pharmaceutical Press: London, UK. www.pharmpress.com

Davis, M. H., Friedman Ben-David, M., Harden, R. M., Howie, P., Ker, J., McGhee, C., Pippard, M.J., & Snadden, B. (2001). Portfolio assessment in medical students’ final examinations. Medical Teacher, 23, 357–366.

Dearing, R. (1997). Great Britain National Committee of inquiry into higher education. In Higher education in the learning society: Report of the national committee. London: National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education.

Friedman, B. D., Davis, M. H., Harden, R. M., Howie, P. W., Ker, J., & Pippard, M. J. (2001). AMEE medical education guide no. 24: Portfolios as a method of student assessment. Medical Teacher, 23, 535–551.

Hall, J., & Ashcroft, D. (2005). Learning about prescribing in the undergraduate pharmacy degree course: The Manchester experience. Pharmaceutical Journal, 274, 799–800.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. London: Prentice Hall. Lonka, K., Slotte, V., Halttunen, M., Kurki, T., Tiitinen, A., Vaara, L., & Paavonen, J. (2001). Portfolios as a learning tool in obstetrics and gynaecology undergraduate training. Medical

Education, 35, 1125–1130.

Pee, B., Woodman, T., Fry, H., & Davenport, E. S. (2000).

Practice-based learning: Views on the development of a reflective learning tool. Medical Education, 34, 754–761.

Pitts, J., Coles, C., & Thomas, P. (2001). Enhancing reliability in portfolio assessment: ‘Shaping’ the portfolio. Medical Teacher,

, 351–356.

Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (2002). Outline curriculum for training programmes to prepare pharmacist supplementary prescribers. London: RPSGB.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and technique. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ashcroft, D. M., & Hall, J. (2018). Using portfolios to learn about prescribing: Qualitative insights into students’ experiences. Pharmacy Education, 6(2). Retrieved from https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/97

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2006)

Section

Research Article

License

It is a condition of the publication that authors vest or license copyright in their articles, including abstracts, in FIP. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and to disseminate the article, and the journal, to the widest possible readership in print and electronic formats as appropriate. Authors may, of course, use the material elsewhere after publication providing that prior permission is obtained from FIP. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.