Establishing pharmacy perceptions of e-learning format, design and development for general practice continuing professional development in Scotland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2025.251.96104Keywords:
CPD, e-learning, Pharmacy education, Segmented learning, Thematic analysisAbstract
Background: This study explores an important area for Continuing Professional Development in pharmacy education and digital learning. Increased demand has generated the necessity for reviewing e-learning module development that successfully meets user needs and learner experience.
Objective: This study investigates learners’ perceptions of standard and segmented e-learning modules and their impact on learner experience to inform future healthcare educational module development.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with pharmacists (14) and pharmacy technicians (1) on the General Practice Clinical Pharmacist programme. Participants were randomised to either single or segmented module design. Fifteen interviews were conducted and data were thematically analysed.
Results: The format allowed for expressing opinions regarding the experience of using the module and highlighted key issues. The analysis identified 125 codes, which resulted in nine themes: Navigation, Interactivity, Structure, Time, Presentation, Resource, Content, Actions and Language.
Conclusion: Results reassure educational providers that e-learning modules suit standard or segmented formats. Findings imply that module format is less important than easy-to-use, well-structured modules with high-quality content. Constructive feedback provided potential improvements to usability, which will help focus future resources and development. More work is needed to explore the translation of learning into practice and the benefit of the segmented format for diverse or interprofessional learners.
References
Barbour R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 322(7294), 1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
Brandy, J., Polak, S., Mendyk, A., & Polak, M. (2018). An e-learning system for pharmacist continuing education in Poland. Pharmacy Education, 6(1). https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/119
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Childs, S., Blenkinsopp, E., Hall, A., & Walton, G. (2005). Effective e‐learning for health professionals and students—barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature—findings from the HeXL project. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 22, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-3327.2005.00614.x
Council, G. P. (2017). Standards for pharmacy professionals. Retrieved from https://www.pharmacyregulation.org
Cunningham, D. E., Alexander, A., Luty, S., & Zlotos, L. (2019). CPD preferences and activities of general practitioners, registered pharmacy staff and general practice nurses in NHS Scotland - A questionnaire survey. Education for Primary Care, 30(4), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2019.1617644
Cunningham, D. E., Ferguson, J., Wakeling, J., Zlotos, L., & Power, A. (2016). GP and pharmacist inter-professional learning - A grounded theory study. Education for Primary Care, 27(3), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2016.1163645
Cunningham, D. E., & Zlotos, L. (2016). Ten years of practice-based small group learning (PBSGL) in Scotland - A survey of general practitioners. Education for Primary Care, 27(4), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2016.1179597
Cunningham, D. E., Zlotos, L., & Power, A. (2014). Scottish pharmacists' perceptions and experiences of a practice-based small group learning pilot: A qualitative study. Education for Primary Care, 25(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2014.11494266
DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine Community Health, 7(2), e000057. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057
Ellaway, R., & Masters, K. (2008). AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher, 30(5), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802108331
Harun, M. H. (2001). Integrating e-learning into the workplace. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00073-2
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Klein, D., & Ware, M. (2003). E-learning: New opportunities in continuing professional development. Learned Publishing, 16, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315103320995078
Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult education. Jossey Bass.
Le Cunff, A. L., Giampietro, V., & Dommett, E. (2024). Neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning: A focus group study. PLoS One, 19(4), e0301932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301932
McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015). A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12509
Micallef, R., Huet, I., & Kayyali, R. (2020). Current reality and preferences for continuing professional development of pharmacists in England – supporting pharmacists to achieve their CPD requirements. Pharmacy Education, 20(1), 103–115. https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/866
NHS Education for Scotland. (2024). NHS Scotland pharmacy workforce (managed service) dashboard. https://turasdata.nes.nhs.scot/data-and-reports/official-workforce-statistics/all-official-statistics-publications/03-december-2024-workforce/dashboards/nhsscotland-pharmacy-workforce-managed-service/
Norris, D., & Kalm, K. (2021). Chunking and data compression in verbal short-term memory. Cognition, 208, 104534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104534
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
O'Loan, L. (2019). Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for pharmacists: Implications for professional practice. Pharmacy Education, 19(1), 26–33. https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/613
Ruggeri, K., Farrington, C., & Brayne, C. (2013). A global model for effective use and evaluation of e-learning in health. Telemedicine and e-Health, 19(4), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2012.0175
Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of E-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002
Salter, S. M., Karia, A., Sanfilippo, F. M., & Clifford, R. M. (2014). Effectiveness of e-learning in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(4), 83. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78483
Scottish Government. (2017). Achieving excellent in pharmaceutical care: A strategy for Scotland. https://www.gov.scot/publications/achieving-excellence-pharmaceutical-care-strategy-scotland
Thalmann, M., Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2019). How does chunking help working memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000578
Vallo Hult, H., & Byström, K. (2022). Challenges to learning and leading the digital workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 44(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2021.1879038
Zlotos, L., Hamilton, P., Park, V., & Stewart, F. (2023). What can the uptake of online pharmacy education in Scotland, during the COVID-19 pandemic, tells us about the future of CPD? Education for Primary Care, 34(5-6), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2023.2272859
Zlotos, L., Power, A., Hill, D., & Chapman, P. (2016). A scenario-based virtual patient program to support substance misuse education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80348
Zlotos, L., & Stewart, F. (2022). Measuring the evolution of online pharmacy education in a national CPD programme, in Scotland, pre-pandemic (2013-14 vs 2018-19). Education for Primary Care, 33(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2021.1970026
